Monday, September 9, 2024

Noah, Nehemiah, or Nabal? Lessons on Engagement with the World

The American church — the real one that clings to the gospel — is wrestling with the current times as political turmoil encroaches on what were once apolitical, basic human activities: marriage, childbearing, choosing correctly between two restrooms.

Having withdrawn a century ago from most of the hospitals and higher education institutions they founded, the church finds itself increasingly handicapped to minister to the lost souls that might be reached through mind or body before their spirits awaken to Truth.  Lacking the leverage that past generations had in good works, we believers may find social or political discourse an increasingly futile exercise.

We are tempted to wring our hands here and wonder what might be done.  We might beg Jesus to come sooner and pine away for past decades that seemed simpler.  We might check out of the fray altogether and focus on the activities of our own families, which are admittedly much more satisfying than arguing with implacable strangers.

Yet God calls us to boldness and risk for the sake of the gospel.  I appeal to those of us tempted to withdraw to comfortable places.  I’m not convinced that any of the weak-willed responses are the right way.  The preacher of Ecclesiastes warns: “Say not, ‘Why were the former days better than these?’  For it is not from wisdom that you ask this” (7:10).  Nor should we try to escape the current conflicts: “No man has power to retain the spirit, or power over the day of death.  There is no discharge from war, nor will wickedness deliver those who are given to it” (8:8).  We are further admonished: “Like a muddied spring or a polluted fountain is a righteous man who gives way before the wicked” (Proverbs 26:26).

We must “do something,” and there is hope in truth-telling:

“Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them.  For it is shameful even to speak of the things that they do in secret.  But when anything is exposed by the light, it becomes visible, for anything that becomes visible is light.  Therefore it says, ‘Awake, O sleeper, and arise from the dead, and Christ will shine on you’ ” (Ephesians 5:11-14).

Works of darkness, once exposed, become part of God’s story (“anything that becomes visible is light”).  Those who get in the fight reflect Christ’s glory (“awake, O sleeper . . . and Christ will shine on you”).  Each generation has had its trials of mortal and immortal combat.

No one can engage in every battle.  We will not all be Wilberforces or Tubmans. How then, to prioritize our efforts?  Let us consider how three biblical figures engaged — or didn’t — in the conflicts of their times.

Noah

Noah lived in times so desperately wicked that the Lord determined to wipe out everyone but Noah and his immediate family.  It’s not clear whether Noah knew how small the final rescue total would be.  In any case, Noah’s peculiar hobby — building a massive wooden boat nowhere near an ocean over a 100-year span — attracted plenty of scornful attention.  He did not waste this opportunity; Peter called him a “preacher of righteousness” (2 Peter 2:5).  And it’s noteworthy that it was God, not Noah, who shut the ark’s door when it started to rain (Genesis 7:16).

We don’t have the text of what Noah said, but he provided his neighbors ample warning of the impending judgment.  While he prioritized his own family’s safety, he wasn’t focused on them exclusively.  He wasn’t content to “mind his own business” and leave his neighbors to drown without warning.

We should all aspire to be like Noah: distinguishable from the world, faithful to his God and family, and unafraid to engage his neighbors who were swept up in the violence, oppression, and immorality of the times.

Nehemiah

Nehemiah was a favored servant in the Persian court.  He asked his pagan king for the opportunity to govern the impoverished and oppressed Jewish exiles who had returned to their homeland.  Returning after 70 years immersed in a hostile culture, they had barely established a foothold in the ancient ruins in the 100 years or so since their return.  They had re-established corporate worship a generation before, but remained the prey of the local warlords and roving gangs.  Nehemiah recognized their need for physical protection, and following that, a restoration of their distinct national identity that had been rooted in their relationship to God.

He began by inspiring the Jewish survivors to take ownership of their problem and rebuild the wall of Jerusalem (Nehemiah 2:17-18).  Just as Noah had been met with scorn for his efforts, Nehemiah was met with immediate mockery and slander from neighboring governors (2:19).  This rapidly grew to threats of violence and attempted intrigue (4:8; chapter 6).  He persevered and, by his strong example, led his ragtag team to finish the wall in 52 days.

Nehemiah also had to deal with cultural rot within his own community.  He discovered the Jewish landlords were oppressing their countrymen with heavy-interest debts, and called them to account publicly (5:7).  He re-instituted the Sabbath observance by brute force (13:21), and helped to expose the infidelity of many men in his community (13:23-27).

Here are some observations about Nehemiah I find intriguing in contrast to other leaders in the Bible”

Nehemiah got no special revelation from God.  His heart broke at the reports of the oppression of his people.  He prayed and planned, then took action.

We have no evidence that Nehemiah had special skills in military leadership or masonry construction.  Yet he inspired those around him to build and provide armed security.

Nehemiah had his own set of weaknesses.  He was a dynamo of personal example and passion when on scene, but appears to have been unsuccessful in getting the next generation to adopt a passion for righteousness.  Things fell apart when he was away (chapter 13).

He lacked the absolute power of Israel’s monarchs from generations past; he was an agent of the Persian king.  As such, like today’s politicians, he was more vulnerable to persecution, including from his own people.  He chose to enter the arena and lead them anyway.

We should support our local and national Nehemiahs, those willing to wade into the cesspool of politics.  They take the spears for us, enduring the mockery and threats that anyone pursuing righteousness in that environment will attract.

Those of us with leadership skills should also consider whether we should follow in Nehemiah’s footsteps and take action without a lightning bolt from God. Yes, our families are important.  But will our children wonder someday why we lacked the courage to fight for what was right?  Or will they come to believe that nothing outside of family is worth fighting for?  What about all the other families that are being oppressed and impoverished by bad policies and capricious leaders?

Nabal

In contrast to the heroic figures above, Nabal engaged with no one but himself, and for nothing but his own pleasure and interest.  He is best known for snubbing David while the latter fled from the persecution of King Saul (see 1 Samuel 25).  His large estate of pasturelands lay in the mountains of south-central Israel, an area where David the fugitive and his band of 400 men (plus families) often took refuge.  On this occasion, David’s men had protected Nabal’s estate from raids and theft, and David sought provisions from Nabal in return.  Nabal brushed David off, and David nearly took his own lethal revenge before Nabal’s wife Abigail intervened.  Shortly thereafter, God struck Nabal dead while he feasted in luxury.

Let us consider some context to discover what a self-centered fool Nabal had become:

Israel was in a period of continuous war with the Philistines, a wealthy and militarily skillful people who occupied the western seaboard (1 Samuel 14:25). Both sides experienced victories and defeats on a fairly regular basis, and this war was unlimited in scope.  Whichever side lost would become the slaves of the other.

Israel’s western frontier was not secure, and the Philistines made frequent incursions to raid Israeli territory (1 Samuel 13:17; 23:27).  This insecure frontier also provided refuge to bandits and other criminals who pillaged targets of opportunity.

Nabal lived some distance from the Philistine frontier, but was still within reach of bandits and Philistine raiders.  The protection that David’s men had provided was worthwhile (1 Samuel 25:15-16).

Nabal had totally disengaged himself and his household from the ongoing war.

Nabal enjoyed the fruits of his labor under the protection of those he despised (25:11).  His was a life of prosperous ingratitude toward God, and indifference toward the struggles of his countrymen.

Don’t be a Nabal.

God laid out the path before us long ago:

“Yet a little while, and the coming one will come and will not delay; but my righteous one shall live by faith, and if he shrinks back, my soul has no pleasure in him” (Hebrews 10:37-38).

God calls us to a life of courage and risk.

Let us follow Noah in a life distinguished by righteousness, family leadership, and bold engagement with those around us.

Let us support the Nehemiahs around us who take many spears on our behalf. Let us not be too quick to dismiss whether social or political responsibility lies before us.

Let us reject the hedonist life of prosperous isolation while others fight the battles for us.

“Who among you fears the Lord and obeys the voice of his servant?  Let him who walks in darkness and has no light trust in the name of the Lord and rely on his God” (Isaiah 50:10).

Help us walk with you, Lord God.

 

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Friday, September 6, 2024

Did Abortions Increase After Dobbs?

A liberal researcher’s latest study finds that women had more abortions during part of this year than the same period before the Dobbs decision, but a pro-life expert says the results bring him skepticism, as well as concern.  The same report noted that blue states have effectively nationalized the purportedly “states’ rights” issue of abortion by sheltering those who illegally mailed hundreds of thousands of abortion-inducing bills to pro-life states.  And the report documented that pro-life protections, at the state level, continued to save unborn babies’ lives.

The new report from the #WeCount project of the Society of Family Planning, recently released, found that the rate of abortions from January through March of this year reportedly exceeded a comparable period in 2022 under Roe v. Wade.  The Dobbs decision, which ruled that the Supreme Court wrongly invented a constitutional “right” to abortion in the infamous 1973 opinion, allowed voters to enact pro-life protections, and more than a dozen states have laws in effect protecting most children from abortion.  Yet “[f]or the first time since #WeCount began, the national monthly total number of abortions has exceeded 100,000,” in 2024, said the report.  “We observed between 94,670 and 102,350 abortions per month, with a monthly average of 98,990.”

“This increase in the national totals appears to be driven by the increase in telehealth abortions,” says the report, when abortion chains such as Planned Parenthood distribute the abortion pill to mothers without an in-person visit. Abortionists use the same telehealth technology used by doctors in the healing arts to disperse the abortion-inducing pills mifepristone and misoprostol to women without checking for attendant health concerns, potentially placing women’s lives at risk.

“This is fatal for unborn children and terrible public health.  If a woman has an ectopic pregnancy, an abortion can be fatal,” said Michael New, Ph.D, a professor of political science and social research at the Catholic University of America and a scholar at the Charlotte Lozier Institute, on “Washington Watch.” Undetected anomalies can also complicate future pregnancies.  Women who undergo chemical abortions report worse mental health outcomes, often citing the need to self-manage their abortions, including flushing their unborn child’s body down the toilet.

Despite the inherent health complications for women, the abortion pill presents great profits for the abortion industry.  “[T]he national monthly number of telehealth abortions in January-March 2024 is 28% higher than the national monthly number of telehealth abortions in January-March 2023,” said the report. “Even excluding abortions provided under shield laws, we still observe more abortions per month in January-March 2024 (monthly average of 89,770 abortions) as compared to the same period January-March 2023 (monthly average of 86,967 abortions), a 3% increase.”

Yet the report appears to credit pro-life state laws with saving lives overall.  It notes that the 14 strongest pro-life states — Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia, and Wisconsin — “have experienced massive declines in the number of abortions.”

“We estimate that overall, if abortion had not been banned in these 14 states, approximately 208,040 abortions would have occurred in-person in these states in the 21 months since Dobbs,” said the report.  “[O]ur data show that due to total abortion bans or 6-week bans, at least 208,000 fewer abortions were provided in-person.”

States with the greatest number of declines since Dobbs: Texas (64,710), Georgia (39,245), Tennessee (24,775), Louisiana (16,175), and Alabama (13,335).  The largest increases came in New York (1,357), California (957), Virginia (597), Kansas (503), and Pennsylvania (430).

The abortion industry and its political allies attempted to chip away at pro-life protections by mailing abortion pills to these states illegally — and six liberal states have passed statutes that the abortion industry refers to as “shield laws,” allowing abortionists to flout other states’ laws with impunity.  “In January-March 2024, there was an average of over 6,700 monthly telehealth abortions provided under shield laws to people in states with total abortion bans or 6-week bans, and nearly 2,500 monthly telehealth abortions provided under shield laws to people in states with restrictions on telehealth abortion,” said the report.  That means abortionists carried out nearly 300,000 illegal remote abortions in states that protect mothers and their children from virtual abortion teleconferences.

The monthly increase of 6,700 virtual abortions, plus a monthly increase of 2,803 in-person abortions in other states, amounts to a total of 9,503 additional abortions a month.  Yet the report found that the 14 most protective states prevented 9,907 abortions each month post-Dobbs.

If the report’s numbers are correct, state pro-life laws saved a net total of 404 babies a month, or 4,848 lives a year.  There are reasons to question the numbers, said New.  “There are three studies looking at Texas birth data, which show that the Texas Heartbeat Act has actually saved 1,000 babies every month,” he said.  “Abortions are often hard to count because women go out of state, or they go to other countries, but babies are easy to count.  And if more children are being born, that’s very powerful evidence that these pro-life laws are having an impact.”

While the allegedly rising abortion rate provides “reason to be concerned, I don’t think there’s reason for despair,” said New, who cited numerous “reasons to be a bit skeptical” about the report’s findings. “Prior to 2022, this organization had never done any U.S. abortion estimates,” he noted.  The latest study’s numbers also conflict with results from the Guttmacher Institute, which was once formally affiliated with Planned Parenthood, and which has been conducting its studies much longer.  “It’s only relatively recently that the Society for Family Planning has started counting telehealth abortions, so I think that’s inflating the numbers a little bit.”  The SFP #WeCount report admitted, “With each report, we continue to refine our imputations and estimates for missing clinics or missing months of data. Thus, monthly totals in some states have been revised from our previous reports.”

The companies may have also provided inaccurate data.  “Telehealth abortions are self-reported by companies that send abortion pills through the mail.  These companies may have incentives to inflate their numbers.  Furthermore, the fact that abortion pills were ordered does not necessarily mean that an abortion was obtained,” wrote New at National Review.  “Some women might have changed their mind,” he added, as the report would not cover the number of lives saved through the abortion pill reversal.

One of the study’s leaders, who has dedicated her research, in part, to advancing abortion pill dispersal nationwide, celebrated the results of the latest study, noting, “It eases the burden on clinics, so it creates more space for the people who are coming to” abortion businesses, said Dr. Ushma Upadhyay, one of the study’s co-leads.  Upadhyay is a professor at the University of California-San Francisco and core faculty of Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH).

A 2021 article about Upadhyay stated she was “very excited” about the California Home Abortion by Telehealth (CHAT) study, “because it could have important implications on access to abortion.”  “People don’t know that medication abortion exists and that it can be done entirely at home safely without a clinic visit,” she pointed out.  The article noted it “will also help expand the awareness about its existence and safety to people” who allegedly “need it.”  It also noted that Dr. Upadhyay deeply involved herself in social and racial justice issues within the institution.  She’s a very active member of the UCGHI Black Lives Matter task force that focuses on both small and large activities at the institution through a racial equity lens.  “It’s something that’s really needed,” Upadhyay said of the BLM/DEI movement.  Her dedication to helping the abortion industry, and pro-abortion politicians, send abortion-inducing drugs to states where they are banned shows “the other side does not view this as a state issue.  They’re trying to nationalize the issue.  Many politically liberal states are effectively exporting abortion,” explained New.  “The birth data do provide powerful evidence that our pro-life laws are saving lives and are building a culture of life,” said New.

“As the abortion pill becomes the primary means of abortion, and the federal government has greenlighted mailing them into EVERY state — abortion is an issue for Bible-believing, Christian voters,” said FRC Action Chairman Tony Perkins.

 

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

Kamala Harris Promises to Impose Abortion on All 50 States as President

Kamala Harris promised to use the federal government to expand abortion nationwide, because Americans cannot “truly be prosperous” without abortion, and pro-life Americans are “out of their minds,” said Harris while accepting the Democratic presidential nomination at the DNC.

Harris basked in the glow of the audience as she stood at the podium of the United Center in Chicago to deliver an acceptance speech long on personal history but slight on policy specifics, aside from a vow to extend the abortion industry into all 50 states, irrespective of each state’s individual laws.  “When Congress passes a bill to restore reproductive freedom, as president of the United States, I will proudly sign it into law,” candidate Harris vowed.  Jarringly, as Harris made those remarks, the official DNC video feed of the acceptance speech panned out to feature a baby in the crowd.

Although Harris did not name a specific bill, the Biden-Harris Administration has endorsed, the so-called “Women’s Health Protection” Act, which goes far beyond the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling by striking down more than 1,300 state pro-life protections including laws:

Prohibiting sex-selective abortions;

Barring many abortions after viability;

Preventing abortions on babies 20 weeks or older, who are capable of feeling pain;

Disallowing abortions undertaken without parental consent or notification;

Prohibiting telemedicine abortion drug prescriptions, which involve no in-person medical examination;

Banning unlicensed individuals from carrying out abortions;

Allowing pregnant mothers to receive scientifically accurate information about their babies’ development, or to see an ultrasound or hear the child’s fetal heartbeat; and

Allowing pro-life medical professionals the right to refuse to participate in an abortion.

A more modest national abortion expansion bill, dubbed the Reproductive Choice Act co-sponsored by Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), would reestablish the guidelines of the Roe and Casey decisions.  However, Senate Democrats and the Biden-Harris Administration have favored the more sweeping, top-down WHP bill.

The abortion issue emerged as the convention’s defining issue, referred to by one speaker after another.  Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), an outspoken advocate of national abortion expansion and regulation of pro-life pregnancy resource centers, promised earlier in the evening that Kamala Harris will “take on the right-wing extremists who think they should decide who has access to abortion or IVF.  Kamala will protect abortion rights nationwide.”  Warren inadvertently put abortion in a separate category from health care, stating that the Democratic Party’s agenda consisted of “groceries, gas, housing, health care, taxes, abortion.”  Earlier in the evening, former Rep. Gabrielle Gifford of Arizona, who was shot while in office, said, “Kamala can beat the gun lobby. ... She will protect abortion access!”

Harris’s acceptance speech signaled a further break with past candidates such as President Bill Clinton, who spoke on Wednesday night; as candidate, Clinton said abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare.” Harris, who has spent much of the last two years since the Dobbs decision as the White House point person on abortion, extolled abortion as a vital component of American liberty.

“I believe America cannot truly be prosperous unless Americans are fully able to make their own decisions about their own lives,” said Harris moments before invoking “reproductive freedom,” the convention’s preferred euphemism for abortion-on-demand.  Her words echoed those of Oprah Winfrey on Thursday night that abortion is part of “the American dream.”

Pro-life advocates pushed back forcefully on the notion.  “Not being allowed to kill your child does not equate to slavery,” responded Bryan Kemper, an Ohio-based pro-life advocate.

In office, Harris has seen her administration give the green light for abortionists to mail the abortion pill, mifepristone, to pro-life states in violation of federal law and furnish taxpayer-funded leave to pregnant members of the military who travel out of pro-life states to undergo an abortion.

Moments after promising to allow surgical abortion throughout the country, Harris slammed her political opponents for pro-life positions they never adopted. “We know, and we know what a second Trump term would look like.  It’s all laid out in Project 2025,” insisted Harris, although CNN’s fact-checker ranked Democrats’ continual references to the Heritage Foundation project — which President Trump has publicly disdained — false.

Trump “and his allies would limit access to birth control, ban medication abortion, and enact a nationwide abortion ban, with or without Congress,” Harris claimed.  “And get this — get this!  He plans to create a national anti-abortion coordinator, and force states to report on women’s miscarriages and abortions.”  “Simply put, they are out of their minds,” Harris thundered.

The demur 2024 Republican Party platform does not promise to enact any federal pro-life protection and leaves all new legislation protecting the unborn to the states, a position President Trump has reiterated consistently.  His campaign and allies denied Harris’s allegations.  “Fact Check: there is no circumstance in which Trump wants to track and monitor miscarriages,” retorted Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah).  “President Trump has REPEATEDLY stated he will not sign a federal abortion ban.  Kamala is a liar,” said Trump 2024 National Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt.

Yet Harris’s speech indicates efforts to distance the GOP from the pro-life issue have failed, and that the Democrats see abortion as anything but a state issue.

In economic policy, Harris vowed, “We will pass a middle-class tax cut that will benefit more than 100 million Americans.”  To date, the Biden-Harris Administration has proposed $7 trillion in tax hikes, according to the Republican-controlled House Ways and Means Committee.

She also promised “to create jobs, to grow our economy and to lower the cost of everyday needs like health care and housing and groceries,” as well as to “end America’s housing shortage, and protect Social Security and Medicare.”  The Biden-Harris Administration presided over near-record inflation levels that peaked at 9.1% in June 2022, increasing the prices of all household staples.  “A loaf of bread costs 50% more today than it did before the pandemic,” admitted Harris at the DNC.  

Ground beef is up almost 50%.  The price of a gallon of gasoline has increased from $2.33 in January 2021 to $3.62.  “It costs a family an extra $13,300 per year for the same house compared to January 2021,” reported Kevin Roberts of the Heritage Foundation.

Harris accused President Trump of seeking to enact “a national sales tax, call it a Trump tax, that would raise prices on middle-class families.”  She is referring to his statement that he may consider an across-the-board tariff on foreign-made goods.

Like the Democratic campaign before President Joe Biden exited the race, much of the party’s rhetoric aims at demonizing President Donald Trump and placing him beyond the pale as a figure committed to overturning “our democracy.”

“The consequences of putting Donald Trump back in the White House are extremely serious,” Harris insisted at the DNC.  “He sent an armed mob to the U.S. Capitol, where they assaulted law enforcement officers.  When politicians in his own party begged him to call off the mob and send help, he did the opposite — he fanned the flames.”  In fact, President Trump encouraged marchers to walk to the Capitol “peacefully” and posted a video online asking them to disperse — a video online platform later suppressed or removed.

“Consider what he intends to do if we give him power again.  Consider his explicit intent to set free violent extremists who assaulted those law enforcement officers at the Capitol; his explicit intent to jail journalists, political opponents, and anyone he sees as the enemy; his explicit intent to deploy our active-duty military against our own citizens,” said Harris.

The threat her opponent may lock up journalists rang hollow to investigator David Daleiden of the Center for Medical Progress.  Daleiden and Sandra Merritt published undercover videos showing officials at the highest levels of Planned Parenthood describing how they perform a potentially illegal partial birth abortion to harvest and sell aborted babies’ organs to scientific researchers.  After pushback from the abortion industry, then-California Attorney General Kamala Harris prosecuted the undercover reporters for filming Planned Parenthood without their express permission—something Daleiden’s lawyer, Harmeet Dhillon, likened to “60 Minutes” investigations.

Daleiden accused Harris of being “‘unburdened by what has been’ in 2016.” Daleiden reminded Harris, “As a citizen journalist, I had my home raided, work product seized at gunpoint, and spent an afternoon behind bars because of your fealty to Planned Parenthood.”

Harris attempted to appeal to moderate and undecided voters, promising to abide by the rule of law.  “I know there are people of various political views watching tonight.  And I want you to know, I promise to be a president for all Americans.  You can always trust me to put country above party and self,” Harris proclaimed.

That echoes a promise repeatedly made at the outset of the Biden-Harris Administration, which critics say turned out to be false.  “I will work as hard for those who didn’t vote for me as those who did,” Biden promised just one day after the media declared him winner of the 2020 election.  Biden made the same promise in his inaugural address.

Once in power, the Biden-Harris Administration oversaw the first FBI raid on the home of a former president, prosecuted peaceful pro-life advocates such as Mark Houck, and attempted to recruit informants inside traditional Roman Catholic churches.  This administration’s targeting of its political enemies has become so outlandish that the House Judiciary Committee formed a subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government to investigate it on a case-by-case basis.

Harris’s critics, especially her Republican opponent, noted that Harris has attempted to distance herself from her own record over the last three years, and to feign powerlessness as the sitting vice president of the United States.

“Why didn’t she do the things that she’s complaining about?” asked Trump immediately after the speech on Fox News.  “She could have done it three and a half years ago ... and she could still do them.  She’s got four-and-a-half, five months left.”  “She didn’t talk about China.  She didn’t talk about fracking.  She didn’t talk about crime ... She didn’t talk about housing or the trade deficit.  She didn’t talk about child trafficking that she’s allowed to happen, because she’s the Border Czar and she’s presided over the weakest border.”  “She talks, but she doesn’t do.  There’s no action.”

 

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Monday, September 2, 2024

Evangelicals ‘More Likely to be Shaped by Culture Than to Influence It’

George Barna, director of research at Arizona Christian University’s Cultural Research Center, released new data earlier this month that “reveals the limitations of Christian evangelicalism in American society.”  

The events from recent years have caused “millions of Americans to realize just how depraved American society has become,” the report stated.  “Corrupt politicians, dishonest journalists and media outlets, broken social institutions, immoral religious leaders, unconstitutional government programs and policies, and more, have generated non-stop headlines highlighting the decadence of American society and the demise of the United States.”

The report went on to contend that “The depth of the depravity is shocking” and that it’s “indisputable” that the “decline is a direct result of the spiritual collapse of Christianity in the nation” — particularly the way in which the evangelical community has changed over time. According to Barna, not only are there fewer evangelicals than some reports have claimed there to be, but many of them “are far less biblical in their thinking … and tend to vote in far fewer numbers than expected.”

The data, said guest host and former Congressman Jody Hice on Thursday’s “Washington Watch,” “also strongly suggests that evangelicals are more likely to be shaped by the culture around them than they are to influence or evangelize it.”  These results are “devastating,” he sighed.  And it begs several questions: What led to this?  What does it say about the current church?  And what is the way forward?

Barna, who also serves as a senior fellow for Family Research Council, joined Hice to discuss the research.  He explained how, unlike some data that finds up to 40% of people (or 100 million Americans) could be evangelical, his own research found that only “10% of adults actually meet the theological criteria for what makes somebody an evangelical,” which is “closer to maybe 25 million people.”  And so, while that’s still a significant number, it’s clearly a big difference in terms of how many evangelicals there are in American society.

But even for those who do meet the theological criteria, part of today’s issue is that many evangelicals “don’t really buy the Bible at face value.  Many of their beliefs are not consistent,” argued Barna.  He continued, “I’m not saying [they’re] a lost cause or they’re bad people, but there’s a lot of misinformation in the minds and hearts of people who, even when you define them theologically as evangelicals, they’re not buying into what the Bible teaches and they’re not living it out.”  This comes in conflict with the heart of what evangelicalism is supposed to do, Barna contended.

According to the study, Hice emphasized, “Many evangelicals perhaps get the big picture of Christianity, but they struggle in the sense of trying to apply those core principles of the Bible to everyday situations.”  As a result, they fall victim to using secular strategies, such as using the “catchy slogans of feel-good behaviors as promoted by our culture in which we live.”  Barna agreed, and he noted how these same people will “believe in the biblical notion of God,” as well as the fact “that God is the basis of all truth,” and “that the purpose of life is to know, love, and serve God with all their heart, mind, and soul.”

“They believe,” he continued, that “the universe was created by God … [and] the reality of Jesus Christ, that He lived on earth … [and] that Satan exists.” The issue is not necessarily in what they believe, Barna explained, but that the fact is, “once you get away from those kind of Sunday School 101 teachings … things get pretty murky.”  The nature and application of moral truth, the definition of what the gospel is, and the deeper theological questions that shape our passions and behaviors are “things that don’t get talked about quite as much in our churches.  And those are the kinds of issues that relate to not only our lives, but also the political issues of the day.”

Digging a little deeper, Barna specifically mentioned how “issues such as abortion, transgenderism, and so forth” are “where evangelicals really struggle to make the connection between biblical truth” and questions of identity, purpose, and Kingdom advancement.  “There’s a degree where their theology comes from the Bible,” Hice analyzed, “but [then] taking that theology into the world is a different matter altogether.”

Barna further discussed how evangelicals are often stereotyped as people who get in your face about their Christian beliefs.  But as he then pointed out, “Our data is showing [that] things have changed over the last 40 years,” and “that’s not what theological evangelicals are like anymore, if they were that way previously.”  For instance, the research shows that evangelicals are significantly unlikely to speak with people who hold different opinions than them.  And when it comes to voting, “[W]e find that … more than a third of them are not likely to vote currently in this upcoming election.”

These realities caused Barna to take a step back and compare evangelicals to another group of Christians called SAGE Cons (spiritually active, governance engaged conservatives).  As opposed to evangelicals, data demonstrates that SAGE Cons are far more likely to consistently promote their faith — not just through evangelism, but in all aspects of life.

“Well over 90% of SAGE Cons voted in each of the last two elections,” Barna stated, whereas evangelicals didn’t even come “close to that number.” Additionally, he emphasized that SAGE Cons were much more likely to be the ones “doing things like boycotting products or services that support a progressive ideology.  Most evangelicals aren’t willing to do that.”  These are only “some of the ways where, [when] we look at … the reality of evangelicalism in America today,” we can see that it’s “far different than the fear-mongering going on in the journalistic realm related to evangelicals, but also perhaps pretty far removed from what many of our pastors and church leaders think is happening with” this specific group.

And frankly, Barna added, the data also revealed that “most evangelicals don’t even attend what’s usually thought of as being an evangelical church.”  But perhaps most notable about these findings, Hice highlighted, is that if “professing evangelicals … don’t have a biblical worldview, and they are not being salt and light in their communities … [then] they’re not evangelizing.”  He posed the question, “Did [the] study in any way determine what kind of impact that [lack of spiritual engagement] is having on our current culture and society?”

Unfortunately, Barna responded, it’s allowed “the media [to] … become the evangelists of America, rather than disciples of Jesus,” who are called to go “out and [do] everything they can to share the love and the saving grace of Jesus with lost sinners.”  But in reality, “what’s happening is … there’s now an evangelistic vacuum in American society,” where both evangelicals and the rest of society are “taking their cues from the media” — which also happens to be one of the primary forces seeking to silence Christianity.  This, Hice stated, is an “indescribably frightening” thought.

Ultimately, Barna contended, “[I]f the followers of Jesus aren’t willing to go out and talk about Him, who’s going to do it?”  Evidently, he added, the “journalists aren’t going to be the ones who are professing the gospel to America.”  All this points to the fact that “we’ve got some major issues … to address.”  As for first steps, Barna urged, “The best place to start is within our families.”

It’s parents, he underscored, who have the responsibility of “doing everything they can … to raise their children up to be spiritual champions, to hear the gospel, to know the gospel, to embrace the gospel, to live the gospel, to share the gospel.  That’s our job as parents and grandparents.  Churches can support us in doing that, but it’s got to start in the home.”  Beyond the home, Barna expressed it’s necessary for Christians to use their voices in the public square — which, as previously acknowledged, is where the difference between SAGE Cons and evangelicals become most obvious.

Barna went on to point out that one of the most significant distinctions is that SAGE Cons are committed to the belief that “they should take their faith into every dimension of our culture, and so they vote at much higher rates than other people.  They talk about issues with other people.  They study the issues much more deeply.”  Barna also explained how SAGE Cons tend to “read the Bible consistently” and better apply it to “today’s issues, to current events, to what political leaders are saying and doing.”  These factors are crucial to consider, Barna argued, because “today’s political leaders are major shapers of our culture.  They have a dramatic level of influence on people’s minds and hearts and souls, whether we want that to be the case or not.”

“Biblical truth is vitally important to SAGE Cons,” he asserted.  “And when they vote … they’re concerned about” getting “biblical perspectives better represented in our public policies, in our laws, in our public institutions that we fund.”  Again, Barna insisted, “There’s a growing distinction between” SAGE Cons and evangelicals. “And frankly, a lot of it is because theologically, evangelicals are not buying everything that the Bible has to sell.  They’re not willing to represent the Kingdom of Christ with power and authority and confidence and consistency in the way that they used to.”

Considering this, Hice asked, “What’s the greatest need for the Christian community in America today?”  According to Barna, we need to “sit back and take a deep and intense and realistic look at your own faith.”  In the Bible, he concluded, there are a few ways in which “Jesus identified what it takes to be a disciple of His.”  By applying that to Christian communities, Barna insisted, believers concerned about being bold in their faith can understand how they must strive to center their lives on “obeying biblical principles … loving other disciples … producing spiritual fruit,” and “loving God far beyond anything else in” their lives.

 

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Friday, August 30, 2024

Same-Sex Marriage Was Never Enough or the End

A pro-family activist says the LGBT movement has convinced lawmakers in his state to pass a radical “parentage equality” bill that redefines the family.

In May of 2004, after the state’s highest court ruled in 2003 that the state’s ban violated the constitutional rights of same-sex couples, Massachusetts (MA) became the first state to legalize homosexual marriage.  Now, in legal terms, a MA family is no longer a mother, a father and their children; it could be two mothers or two fathers with children through adoption or some other means.

Brian Camenker, founder and president of MassResistance, tells American Family News (AFN) the new legislation could declare, among other things, that a child has more than two biological parents. “When the LGBT movement used the courts to force same-sex marriage on America, that was not the end of it,” he asserts.  “They said all of this won’t affect anything, but now, their next step is to redefine the family to accommodate that in law.”  He says homosexual activists have already gotten several states to sort of do that, but what they have accomplished in MA is huge.  

The legislature has unanimously passed this 42-page comprehensive bill; that means every Republican and Democratic member in the 200-member legislature voted for it.  It accommodates surrogacy and all kinds of different ways that children can be born artificially.  “Because same-sex couples can’t have children normally, it takes the word ‘mother’ out of family law and replaces it with ‘person who gave birth to the child,’ ” Camenker details.  “ ‘Father’ is replaced throughout family law with ‘other parent.’ ”  Additionally, a baby’s mother and father can be changed on the birth certificate to two adults of the same sex.  He says this is all about fulfilling the selfish and un-natural wants of adults, not meeting the needs of children, who are now commodities that can be bought and sold and destined to grow up in dysfunctional environments.

Meanwhile, the press is pretending like there is no opposition to this, but Camenker assures AFN that there is.  “At least one Republican state rep. is being primaried on this issue,” he relays.  But if pro-family conservatives continue to keep quiet, he warns that more and more will be told to radically change their states’ laws to satisfy a tiny minority of dysfunctional people.

 

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Wednesday, August 28, 2024

Appeals Court Revives Christian Case Against Washington State Law

A Christian group in Washington state has shown it’s being injured by a state bias law, a federal appeals court ruled on Aug. 12, reversing a lower court decision and reviving the group’s case against state officials.

The Union Gospel Mission of Yakima, WA, sued over the Washington Law Against Discrimination, which bars employers from discriminating based on sexual orientation.  The group said the law is unconstitutional and that it is being affected by the law because it distributes a form for employees to sign that agrees to adherence to a Christian lifestyle and beliefs, including only engaging in sexual conduct in a marriage between a man and a woman.  Due to the threat of prosecution, the group stopped listing job openings, paused hiring, and decided not to publish requirements for its employees online, the group said in its suit.  That means the law “has thus chilled the mission’s religious exercise and speech, and is causing irreparable harm every single day the mission cannot express its beliefs and hire coreligionists who live them out.”  

U.S. District Judge Mary K. Dimke in 2023 rejected the suit, finding that the case was outside of her jurisdiction because it sought a review of precedent established by the WA Supreme Court, which has ruled that a Christian group violated the law when it decided not to hire a man who was in a gay relationship.

A U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit panel, though, said on last week that Dimke should not have turned away the case.  The Union Gospel Mission has shown that it is being injured by the law by having to self-censor and there is a possibility state officials will prosecute the group if it continues to hire based on the belief that marriage is between a man and a woman, the panel said. That’s based in part on how state officials have repeatedly refused to commit to not enforcing the law against the mission, the judges said.  The decision overturned Dimke’s ruling with regard to the dismissal of the case and her rejection of the mission’s request for a preliminary injunction as moot.  The panel remanded the case to the district judge to reconsider based on ripeness. She should think about entering a preliminary injunction, the judges directed. The panel consisted of U.S. Circuit Judges Milan D. Smith Jr., Mark J. Bennett, and Anthony D. Johnstone.  

A spokesperson for WA Attorney General Robert Ferguson did not respond to a request for comment. Alliance Defending Freedom senior counsel Ryan Tucker, who is representing the mission, said in a statement that the appeals court “rightly overturned the lower court’s dismissal, permitting the ministry to pursue protection for its constitutional rights in federal court.”

 

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Monday, August 26, 2024

Franklin Graham Blasts Leftists After They Use His Deceased Dad for ‘Evangelicals for Harris’ Ad

Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign will do just about anything to drum up support for its candidate — no matter how dishonest it is.  While outright stealing policies from former President Donald Trump is low, using the deceased for political ads is even lower.  That’s exactly what the Harris campaign did with an ad featuring the late Southern Baptist Minister Billy Graham.

Last week, MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” posted a clip to the social media platform X from a political ad from “Evangelicals for Harris” with footage of Graham.  The footage shows him giving a sermon in which he impresses upon listeners the need to talk to ask God for forgiveness, and change.  The clip then fades into an interview Trump did at the Family Leadership Summit in 2015 in Ames, IA. Republican Polster Frank Luntz asks Trump, “Have you ever asked God for forgiveness?”  Trump responded, “I’m not sure I have.  I don’t bring God into that picture.”

Billy Graham’s son, Franklin, took to X to understandably express his rage with the ad and how the Harris campaign represented his father’s values.  Seeing this as stunningly insulting and shameful to the memory of his father, Graham wrote, “The liberals are using anything and everything they can to promote candidate Harris.”  He then proceeded to remind his audience of whom his father actually supported in his lifetime.  “Maybe they don’t know that my father appreciated the conservative values and policies of President @realDonaldTrump in 2016, and if he were alive today, my father’s views and opinions would not have changed.”  

It is inarguable that this was a poor decision by the Harris campaign and one they owe Graham and his family and apology for, but in the broader context, it also shows how desperate this campaign is. While few would accuse Trump of being overly pious, this clip is from 2015.  While looking at previous remarks by a candidate is standard in politics, the remark isn’t a smoking gun where Trump proclaimed his lifelong allegiance to the devil.  More recently, Trump made remarks after surviving an assassination attempt in July in which he more strongly stated his faith.  

The Harris campaign is using Graham in contrast to Trump because it can’t use their own candidate. For one thing, old footage of Graham is easier on the ears, but for another, Harris clearly doesn’t have anything to say on the issue of faith that would win over God-fearing Americans.

 

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Friday, August 23, 2024

9 Facts about Tim Walz’s Church

VP Kamala Harris selected Governor Tim Walz (MN-D) as her running mate, and many Americans are naturally curious to know more about him, including his religious beliefs.  Walz does not often discuss his faith, but he occasionally mentions that he attends Pilgrim Lutheran Church in St. Paul, MN (both instances are from 2020).  Here are nine facts about Walz’s church.

1. Pilgrim Lutheran Church in St. Paul is a member of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), a liberal association of Lutherans in the United States.

In 1976, Pilgrim Lutheran left the LCMS to join the Association of Evangelical Lutheran Churches (AELC) over “views on the inerrancy of the Bible,” the church explains on its website.  “The Missouri Synod was quite firm in the belief that the Bible was without error.  Others — pastors, scholars, and lay persons — felt that the Bible, while inspired, had portions where informed people could have differing opinions.”  The AELC later merged with other groups to form the ELCA.

2. The lead pastor of Pilgrim Lutheran Church is Jen Rome.

According to the church website, Jen Rome (“she/her”) “received her Masters of Divinity Princeton Theological Seminary in 2000” and “has 17 years of experience in bringing people of all generations to deeply experience and creatively connect with God, the world, and each other.”  She is married with two daughters, and the family lives “inter-generationally” in a duplex with her in-laws.

On Sunday, August 4, Rome delivered a homily based on a reading from John 6, in which, after feeding the 5,000, Jesus teaches that he is the bread of life. “Jesus goes on and on forever, it seems,” said Rome, but “what Jesus is talking about is setting aside or being healed from what causes you and the ones around to perish, to receive what is life-giving.”

Drawing an object lesson from a fictional, young-adult book series in which a young girl studies dragon science in defiance of societal expectations, Rome urged all her hearers to free themselves from the “garbage” of societal norms. She discussed her struggle with aging, saying her body no longer attains what she believes society expects from the female figure, adding that “it is amazing garbage that can go through this feminist’s head.”

“We humans love to make systems or hierarchies, whether that’s government, or religion, or gender, or race.  We just live in all that stuff.  We breathe it in, and the dynamics just circulate around in ourselves,” she said.  But she imagined that Jesus would deliver quite a different message: “You, with the sick body, you are important.  You, who do something for a living that others don’t appreciate, you are my child.  You, who have been excluded by society for simply being who you are, whatever shape your body took, you are God’s child.”

3. Pilgrim Lutheran Church pursues a ‘varied and creative’ liturgy, particularly at evening services

“Evening worship at Pilgrim is varied and creative, focusing particularly on contemplation and a sense of calm mindfulness, most notably in the music, readings, use of silences, and lighting,” the website explains.  “There is no sermon, so the Celtic Contemplative Communion and Contemplative Prayer from Nordic and Other Lands services use a unique style of ‘Word Weavings.’” The church website lists multiple staff experienced in Celtic and Nordic music, led by Composer-in-Residence Dick Hensold (“he/him”).

The church’s “word weaving” aims to “combine scripture and poetry in a way that is inspired by the ancient practice of ‘Lectio Divina.’  These ‘weavings’ juxtapose phrases from the readings in new ways to inspire deeper experience with the texts.”

While most deliberate in its evening services, Pilgrim Lutheran also embraces an open-ended worship liturgy in its Sunday morning gatherings.  In the most recent service on August 4, for example, Pastor Rome announced a “U-pick hymn sing” after the conclusion of her homily and prayer, inviting attendees to select their favorite hymns out of the hymnal.

4. At Pilgrim Lutheran Church, anyone may partake in the Lord’s supper.

“All people are ALWAYS welcome to receive Holy Communion,” announced the church newsletter.  Rome confirmed this at the most recent service, declaring, “You are all welcome at this table.  Whatever your age, wherever you are at in your life of doubt and faith … you are welcome at Christ’s table.”

This differs from the practice of many churches that restrict the Lord’s table to baptized believers, based on Paul’s warning to the Corinthians: “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord.  Let a person examine himself, then, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup.  For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body eats and drinks judgment on himself.  That is why many of you are weak and ill, and some have died” (1 Corinthians 11:27-30).

5. Pilgrim Lutheran Church recites a modified version of the Lord’s prayer.

After reciting Jesus’ instructions about the Lord’s supper from Matthew 26:26-28, Rome led the congregation in a modified version of the Lord’s prayer.  “And now,” she said, “we pray together the prayer that Jesus taught us, saying, ‘our guardian, our mother, our father in heaven, hallowed by thy name …’”

According to the Gospel according to Matthew, Jesus said, “Pray then like this: ‘Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name …’” (Matthew 6:9).  The gospel of Luke contains a similar, but slightly abbreviated, teaching, in which Jesus says, “When you pray, say: ‘Father, hallowed be your name …’” (Luke 11:2).

6. Pilgrim Lutheran Church welcomes and affirms people who identify as LGBT+ and follow those lifestyles.

“Pilgrim is a Reconciling in Christ church,” their website states, “which includes a partnership with Reconciling Works, a ministry devoted to welcoming, celebrating, and advocating for the full inclusion of LGBTQIA+ individuals in Lutheran faith communities.”

“Reconciling Works advocates for the acceptance, full participation, and liberation of all sexual orientations, gender identities, and gender expressions within the Lutheran Church,” according to their website.

Reconciling Works offers trainings with titles such as “Lutheran Introduction to Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, & Gender Expression [SOGIE]” and “Let’s talk SOGIE.”  It directs youth and families to PFLAG, an LGBT activist group that lobbies for explicit books in school libraries and against legislation to protect minors from gender transition procedures.

All six members of the Reconciling Works Board of Directors identity as LGBT, not including their non-binary chaplain.  The current chair of the board has three children, two of whom (ages nine and 14) also identify as LGBT, while she considers the youngest, age four, to be “he/him until otherwise declared.”

In addition to their partnership with Reconciling Works, Pilgrim Lutheran also incorporates LGBT-inclusivity throughout their church culture.  Their staff page lists the preferred pronouns of every team member, including one, a Kindergarten teacher, who identifies as “she/they.”  The church also hosts a trans-friendly, monthly event for mothers, advertising, “All those who identify themselves as mamas from Pilgrim are invited to a Pilgrim Mamas get together approximately once a month in the later evening.”

7. Pilgrim Lutheran Church promotes at least five anti-racism initiatives.

On its “ministries” page, Pilgrim Lutheran Church lists an Advocates for Racial Equity (ARE) team, which works “to overcome white supremacy by aligning with Pilgrim’s ‘Mission of Outreach and Welcome’ and ‘Doing Justice’ as we live out the counterculture values of the gospel through education, relationship building and advocacy.”

The ARE team developed a land acknowledgement statement “to acknowledge the traditional Indigenous inhabitants of the land we are on, inspiring us towards ongoing awareness and action.  The full land acknowledgment is below (the ARE team also approved a shortened version that omits the bracketed material): “This land is not just this address.  From time immemorial the Dakota people’s lives and stories have been woven together with this land.  [They were forcibly exiled from their land starting with the treaties of 1837 and 1851 and were nearly exterminated after the 1862 US Dakota war.  We acknowledge the Dakota people, past and present, for their ongoing story and care of this land. We condemn and lament the way colonialism pillaged both the land and the Dakota way of life.  Pilgrim Lutheran Church commits to ongoing efforts to recognize, support, and advocate for the Dakota and other Indigenous peoples.] Let us take a moment of silence to honor the Dakota people, their heritage and resiliency.”

Additionally, Pilgrim Lutheran Church maintains a reparations fund “directed specifically to respond to inequities in homeownership for BIPOC families.”  The ARE team has led the church in a “process of making reparations for its tacit participation in the system of housing segregation.”

Pilgrim Lutheran Church also participates in a Joint Church Anti-Racism Team (JCART), “a collaborative effort of study and action” of four local mainline churches.  JCART studies varied topics and is currently engaged in studying “Indigenous/Native understanding and issues.”

Most broadly, Pilgrim Lutheran Church participates in “a multi-racial, state-wide, nonpartisan coalition” called ISAIAH, which is “fighting for racial and economic justice in Minnesota” through “activism, organizing, and political action.”  ISAIAH celebrated the “bold, progressive agenda” that passed the Minnesota legislature in 2023 and laid out its 2024 legislative priorities: expansion of green energy, publicly-funded daycare, publicly-funded health care, rent control, and trimming down voting requirements.

Pilgrim Lutheran Church also offers a Pilgrims Caring for Creation group, which aims “to reduce material and energy waste on our church campus” and sponsors “education and public events on issues of environmental justice.”  The Environmental Justice Movement battles “environmental racism” by working “to improve and maintain a clean and healthful environment, especially for communities of color.”  Pilgrim Lutheran has been designated a “Caring for Creation” Congregation by Minnesota Interfaith Power & Light.

8. Pilgrim Lutheran Church emphasizes social issues in its prayer requests.

On the penultimate page of its church newsletter, Pilgrim Lutheran Church lists concerns for prayer. The lower half of the page lists ongoing health concerns, those mourning the loss of loved ones, and ministry partners.  The upper half of the page reads as follows:

“We pray for God’s loving presence for these Pilgrims who need healing, hope, comfort, and care:

“We pray for the people of areas torn by war and violence, including Gaza and Ukraine, for peace and safety.  We also pray for those who are refugees fleeing violence seeking help and hope.

“We pray for the loved ones and communities of all victims of gun violence across our country.

“We pray for our governor and all elected officials and public servants.  Guide them and support them in their work to care for our cities, our state, and our nation.

“We pray for those whose lives are altered by climate events.  We pray for creation and for an increased will to care for it.

“We pray for all in the LGBTQIA+ community who face bias, rejection, and violence.  We pray that we may all grow in acceptance and each become a voice for acceptance, advocacy, and support as an expression of Pilgrim’s status as a Reconciling in Christ community of faith.

“We keep in prayer our Native, Asian, Latino, and Black siblings who continue to face the legacy of racism.  We pray for change in systems of oppression and injustice, and that we all may learn to follow the path of anti-racism, and each become a voice for inclusion, equity, and justice.

“We pray for our Muslim and Jewish siblings, as well as our siblings of other religions, in our country, state, and community facing prejudice, threats, and destruction of their places of worship.”

9. Pilgrim Lutheran Church maintains a partnership with a Lutheran Congregation in Tanzania.

Pilgrim Lutheran has maintained a partnership with the Luganga Lutheran congregation, of the Iringa Diocese of Tanzania, since 2002.  Luganga Lutheran is part of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Tanzania (ELCT).

In contrast to its mainline American counterpart, the ELCT prominently displays on its website its mission “To make people know Jesus Christ and have life in [his] fullness by bringing to them the Good News through words and deeds based on the Word of God as it is in the Bible and the Lutheran teachings guided by the ELCT Constitution.”

 

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel