Friday, December 30, 2016

A Court’s Decision to Keep ‘In God We Trust’ on U.S. Currency


‘In God We Trust’ – our nation’s official motto – was first adopted in 1956 as an alternative to the unofficial ‘E Pluribus Unum’ (Of Many, One) placed on the Great Seal of the United States upon its adoption in 1782.

‘In God We Trust’ began appearing on our nation’s paper currency in 1957, but it had been used on coins dating as far back as 1864 … as so ordered by President Lincoln.  But (recently) a lawsuit filed by a group of atheist humanists sought to have it removed from all currency, insisting that it violated the ‘Establishment Clause’ of the 1st Amendment.

The American Legion, with the legal assistance of the First Liberty Institute, filed an amicus brief with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in May.  That brief stated the plaintiffs in the case were making three errors in their argument: (1) Confusing free exercise doctrine with Establishment Clause doctrine; (2) Confusing the purpose of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act; and (3) Confusing government speech with compelled speech.

In the brief, attorneys wrote: “The American Legion believes that our National Motto, ‘In God We Trust’ itself originating in Francis Scott Key’s poem that would become ‘The Star-Spangled Banner’ and honoring the courage and valor of our service members who defended Fort McHenry during the War of 1812, is a fitting and solemnizing motto for this nation.  The American Legion has, therefore — as recognized even in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint — regularly advocated for the recognition and honor of our National Motto as well as its history and heritage.”

Ultimately, U.S. District Judge Benita Y. Pearson granted a motion to dismiss the case on Nov 30.  She ultimately agreed with the arguments made in the First Liberty and American Legion brief.  First Liberty President and CEO Kelly Shackelford said he was grateful the court upheld the federal government’s ability to display the national motto on currency.  “Federal courts have repeatedly upheld the national motto as constitutional,” he said.  “‘In God We Trust’ is deeply embedded in our nation’s history and is a symbol of patriotism.”

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Wednesday, December 28, 2016

PC Affects LGBT Scientific Studies


False and misleading data on homosexuality is being published … warns a major U.S. magazine.  The National Review reports that studies on the lives of LGBT (lesbian/gay/bisexual/transsexual) people have proved to be unfounded.  The practice of ignoring facts to present data that fits with popular, liberal opinion has caused a backlash in the scientific community.

The National Review highlights a study that claims that “minority stress” is reducing the life expectancy of homosexuals by 12-years.  It was widely reported by parts of the press under headlines such as: “Can Prejudice Kill You?  Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Life Expectancy Drops 12 Years in Anti-Gay Communities.”

In mid-November, academic journal Social Science and Medicine published a well-evidenced refutation.  Researchers attempted to replicate the author’s data using 10 different approaches; but were unable to do so.  They concluded that no approach could obtain findings “that supported the original study’s conclusions.”

Another pro-LGBT study, published in the journal Science in 2015, has also been discredited.  It purported to show that canvassing by LGBT people had a major effect on people’s opinions of them.  But a lone student’s research found it had been entirely faked. The author had lied about receiving grants from real institutions.  New York Magazine reported that the student was constantly opposed and told to keep quiet, “lest he earn a reputation as a troublemaker.”

Commenting on the increasing prevalence of unsubstantiated scientific studies, National Review contributor and author Maggie Gallagher said: “Science is not right-wing or left-wing.  But to work, it needs scientists fearlessly committed to truth over their preferred outcomes.”  She revealed that an academic project has been set up that is committed to “viewpoint diversity.”

The Heterodox Academy is concerned that: “When nearly everyone in a field shares the same political orientation, certain ideas become orthodoxy, dissent is discouraged and errors can go unchallenged.”

If your process of scientific research is infected by political correctness, then it can no longer to be perceived as a healthy pursuit of the truth.

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Monday, December 26, 2016

Pastors of 2,500 Churches Respond to OH Gov. Kasich’s Heartbeat Veto


More than likely, Ohio Gov. John Kasich didn’t anticipate this kind of reaction coming when he decided to veto a legislative bill that would have outlawed abortion once a fetal heartbeat is detected.

At a press conference held at the Ohio Statehouse last week, a group of pastors urged Republicans to override the governor’s veto.  They said they represent “no less than 2,500 churches in the state of Ohio,” and tens of thousands of registered voters who “care deeply about this issue.”

“We would like to make a declaration and to challenge our legislators that we’re going to stand with you.  We’re here, we’re growing and we’re not going anywhere,” J.C. Church, senior pastor of Victory in Truth Ministries, said.  “We’re asking the Speaker of the House to call for a vote to override this decision that the governor has made, because we’re here to promote and advocate for life.”

“The lives of 60 million aborted babies compel us to consider the weight of this bill and what it can accomplish and the lives that it can save,” Tim Throckmorton, senior pastor at Crossroads Church, added.  “Let me suggest that the millions of unborn whose lives are in the balance plead with us that we continue to stand for life; that we continue to stand together.”

The ‘heartbeat bill’ … as it has been called … was actually an amendment to a bill dealing with reporting child abuse and neglect, which made it easier for Kasich to remove with his line-item veto authority.  A separate bill, which prohibits abortions after 20-weeks’ gestation, was signed into law instead.  That bill was supported by Ohio Right to Life and other abortion opponents, which did not support the fetal heartbeat language. Those seeking to abolish abortion entirely, however, have been vocal in their outrage, and they’re mobilizing to put pressure on Republicans to override the veto.

The overall legislation was approved by a 56-39 vote in the Ohio House of Representatives, with only a few Republicans voting against it.  Sixty votes are needed to overturn Kasich’s veto, but time is running out — supporters have only until the end of the year to get an override vote.

A spokesman for Speaker of the House Cliff Rosenberger (R-Clarksville) said Republicans were reviewing their options.  He did note the 20-week ban was an “important step forward in protecting life” … but also noted many members of the caucus were angered by the “step back” Kasich’s veto represented.

The bill’s primary sponsor, Rep. Christina Hagan (R-Alliance), has vowed to push for an override: “Our passion for the unborn will not cease because of one man’s action,” she said.  “We will continue the fight for babies to experience the milestones which every human deserves.  As my daughter took her first steps today, I thought how great it would be for every child with a beating heart to experience such joy.  It is clear, albeit heart-wrenching today, that my work here has just begun and our fight as a movement continues.”

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Friday, December 23, 2016

Ohio Law Clears Committee to Protect Pastors


An Ohio (OH) bill protecting pastors who refuse to perform weddings that do not conform to their convictions cleared the House Committee.  The bill, known as the “Pastor Protection Act” (H.B. 286), also protects religious organizations that refuse to lend their church buildings to be used for such events.

The bill was approved by the House Community and Family Advancement Committee with a 9-4 vote.  It has been referred to a vote on the House Floor.

The bill says those who refuse to officiate same-sex weddings or don’t allow their buildings to be used for such ceremonies are “immune” from punishment and “neither the state nor a political subdivision of the state shall penalize or withhold any benefit or privilege from the ordained or licensed minister or religious society, including any governmental contract, grant, or license.”  The bill goes on to say, “No ordained or licensed minister … or religious society … is required to solemnize a marriage that does not conform to the ordained or licensed minister’s or religious society’s sincerely held religious beliefs.”  The bill further says, “No religious society is required to allow any building or property of the religious society to be used to host a marriage ceremony for a marriage that does not conform to the religious society’s sincerely held religious beliefs.”

Rep. Nino Vitale (R-Urbana) first proposed the bill in July.  The purpose of H.B. 286 is to allow pastors the freedom to reject participation from activities that go against their conscience, he explained.  In spite of what the bill’s critics say, Vitale maintained the bill had nothing to do with discrimination.  “This is not an issue of discrimination,” he said.  “It is an issue of protection; protection for those who have committed their lives to the service of God and their community.”

Various groups gave their support to the “Pastor Protection Act,” including the American Freedom Law Center and Liberty Counsel.

OH is not the only state where a legislation that protects ordained ministers and religious organizations is in place.  Legislation in Texas cleared both upper and lower House chambers, and was signed by the governor into law.  In other states like Alabama, Oklahoma and Tennessee, similar legislations have passed one House chamber, according to LifeSiteNews.

If my state of Minnesota would follow suit, I would consider performing weddings again; but not until my right of conscience is protected.

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Wednesday, December 21, 2016

Comparing the Celebration of Christmas to Choosing Abortion


Daytime television personality – Whoopi Goldberg – has decided that celebrating Christmas can now be compared to the right to an abortion.  She believes the observation of the most significant birth of all human history – the birth of the Christ Child of Bethlehem – is the same as a woman being given permission to end the life of her unborn child.

Last week, Goldberg engaged in a debate with her View co-hosts about the separation between church and state in regards to public Nativity scenes to celebrate Christmas. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, she took the opportunity to bring up abortion saying it is “the same conversation with a woman’s right to choose.”  Goldberg argued, “What I do with my body is my right.  It is not your right to tell me.  The same thing is it’s – if you believe in Christmas, it’s not my right ... and, you know, kids who didn’t go to Catholic school had Christmas and they – we never knew what their religions were, but we hung cause it was Christmas holiday.”

Goldberg’s statement is absurd.  How is the birth of Jesus the same as the death of a baby?  An abortion affects not only the woman making the decision but also her unborn child.  Furthermore, the issue is even more complex due to policy debates such as the federal funding of Planned Parenthood (PP).
       
Goldberg not only heinously compared celebrating Christ’s birth to the right to abort, but she has also long been an advocate for PP – the United States’ largest abortion provider – which carries out over 320,000 of the procedures every year.

Remember: PP relies on numerous corporate supporters to carry out its abortion agenda. Many major corporations … that you may well shop with each day … donate to the organization either directly or through third party groups.

Listen: Don’t continue to say you are pro-life and continue give business to companies behind PP.  If more of us would cease to do business with these companies, we can begin to make a change.  If you don’t know these companies, click on this link https://www.2ndvote.com/plannedparenthood/

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Monday, December 19, 2016

A Victory for Religious Liberty


Four pastors in Massachusetts (MA) are dropping their lawsuit against the state after the attorney general’s office revised the interpretation of a new gender identity anti-discrimination law which categorized churches as places of public accommodation.

The state’s move protects the 1st Amendment rights of MA churches to express their beliefs about gender and sexuality and operate their bathrooms in a manner consistent with their theology.

Classifying churches as places of public accommodation is virtually unprecedented and potentially opens them up to a variety of anti-discrimination laws that could clash with their beliefs.

Just last month, a federal judge struck down such a categorization in Iowa noting that “state and federal courts have held that churches and programs they host are not places of public accommodation.”

In July, MA lawmakers amended the state’s anti-discrimination law to prohibit discrimination in places of public accommodation based on a person’s stated gender identity.  The trouble for churches came Sept. 1st, when the MA Commission Against Discrimination issued a “Gender Identity Guidance” that said churches could be considered as places of public accommodation under certain conditions.  “A church could be seen as place of public accommodation if it holds a secular event, such as a spaghetti supper, that is open to the general public,” said the commission.  The guidance says that an individual’s gender identity can be identified “by an evidence that the gender identity is sincerely held as a part of the person’s core identity.”  The guidance goes on to explain that preventing a person from using a bathroom or other sex-segregated facility that’s consistent with their gender identity violates the law.  It also says that places of public accommodation should follow best practices, such as using pronouns that transgender people prefer, refraining from derogatory comments and avoiding gender-specific dress codes.

The attorney general’s office also issued a “Gender Identity Guidance for Public Accommodations” and said that “houses of worship” are places of public accommodation.

Now, the attorney general’s office says that its revision to the guidance removes the “categorical reference to ‘houses of worship’ as an example of a ‘place of public accommodation.’ ”

Genevieve Nadeau, Chief of the Civil Rights Division in the attorney general’s office noted that the pastors’ lawsuit “caused us to focus on these issues and to make this revision.”

Thank God for the boldness of these four pastors to stand-up against this anti-discrimination law.  Reminds me of four children of Israel in Babylon who refused to bow-down to an idol. [read Daniel 3]

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Friday, December 16, 2016

A Legal Case That May Challenge the Falsehood That Gay Rights Are Civil Rights


A discrimination case, currently before a Chicago federal appeals court, is being watched closely.  Attorneys for lesbian teacher Kimberly Hively allege she was denied a full-time position and later fired at Ivy Tech Community College (located in Indiana) due to her sexuality – a claim the school denies.  But it’s her attorneys’ claim of a Civil Rights Act violation that is raising eyebrows … since the landmark 1964 law includes sex, but not sexual orientation.

Micah Clark, of the American Family Association (AFA) of Indiana says, “It’s a hijacking of the Civil Rights movement to equate a sexual choice or behavior with an inborn genetic trait like skin color.”  [BTW: This was the same argument used in 2010 when congress repealed ‘Don’t Ask/Don’t Tell’ … permitting homosexuals in the U.S. Armed Forces to be “openly gay.”  I made the argument in my U.S. Army War College (USAWC) thesis that homosexuality is not an innate (God-given) characteristic equal to the rights declared in our Declaration of Independence … as originating from our “Creator.”]

The case was heard November 30th in front of the 7th Circuit after it was first dismissed in 2015, when the court ruled that Hively failed to make her claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act reports The Chicago Tribune.  An appeals court upheld that ruling in July, but agreed in October to vacate that ruling and rehear the case.  The Tribune story said Hively was represented by an attorney for Lambda Legal – a law organization that champions homosexual rights.  The Lambda attorney asked the judges to “interpret the law in a broader sense than how it was written half a century ago,” the story recounted.

The involvement of Lambda suggests the importance of the discrimination case to homosexual activists, and a cursory online search shows Hively’s case is being watched by a sympathetic audience.

“7th Circuit can make civil rights history for gay and lesbian employees,” declares the story headline written by a Reuters legal columnist.

“This woman’s court case could secure LGBT rights in the workplace,” predicts a headline at New York Magazine.

AFA Clark warns that a legal battle is brewing in the 7th Circuit that could force a church-operated Christian school, for example, to hire open homosexuals per a new interpretation of the Civil Rights Act.  And that’s not just a far-fetched prediction, either.  Christian colleges in California faced a similar situation this year, and churches in Massachusetts are fighting back in that liberal state.  “When you elevate a sexual behavior with moral connotations such as homosexuality,” Clark warns, “you tend to take away rights of free speech and religious liberty.”

Again, I stated back in 2010 in my USAWC thesis that the homosexual agenda was not merely about serving openly in the military, but well beyond – to same-sex ‘marriage’ and ‘employment’ rights, etc. – but ultimately the silencing of the truth of God’s Word.

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

A Gay State Official Takes to Task a Non-Profit’s ‘Charitable’ Status


Connecticut State employees could be denied the opportunity to contribute to a qualified charity after the state comptroller became personally offended by a non-profit’s Biblical stance on marriage.

In a November 30 letter to American Family Association (AFA) President Tim Wildmon, comptroller Kevin Lembo notes what he calls out AFA’s “so-called attempts to protect family values.”  Those values include holding to a Biblical stance on marriage and several boycotts of companies like Target that champion values contrary to scripture.  Lembo writes that those actions are extremely troubling to him as a “married” homosexual.

Lembo is threatening to kick AFA out of the Connecticut State Employees’ Campaign for Charitable Giving (CSECC) … even though the Mississippi-based group qualifies as a charity under Connecticut’s rules.

Abraham Hamilton III is general counsel and public policy analyst for AFA says, “What’s being foisted upon the American Family Association is the latest iteration of If you don’t adhere to the nouveaux orthodoxy of the day – which is the sexual deviancy agenda – then you must be castigated and expelled from public life,” to OneNewsNow.

In his letter to Wildmon, Lembo states: “The AFA’s statements and mission not only appear to discriminate against the LGBTQ communities ... but it remains unclear what actual charitable services the AFA provides that qualifies it to participate in the CSECC.  I am, therefore, initiating an investigation to determine whether AFA is in compliance with the requirements of the CSECC.”

Hamilton calls the threat from Lembo an abuse of power.  “Because of his personal objections to the American Family Association’s stance on issues like marriage and the Target boycott, then he sees fit to threaten us with his governmental position,” Hamilton states.  Hamilton says the attack by the comptroller of Connecticut is the latest in what he says is a broader war on people of faith.  “This issue ... really brings into focus why a lot of people supported Donald Trump as opposed to Hillary Clinton,” says the policy analyst.  “People feared the federal government – more specifically the IRS or the Department of Justice – being used as means of cultural and societal intimidation.”

In an Action Alert to its supporters, AFA calls Lembo’s letter “nothing more than an attack on AFA for standing strong for Biblical principles.”  The pro-family group also points out that while the state comptroller suggests AFA may be violating his state’s anti-discrimination prohibitions, “the letter never cites any state or federal laws of which AFA might be in violation.”  AFA is urging its supporters to contact Lembo and urge him to retract his letter and to “apologize for using the authority of the comptroller’s office for a personal grudge.”

Note: From 2000-2015, Connecticut employees contributed a total of $124 to AFA through the CSECC program.  I’ve got to believe that Connecticut Comptroller Lembo has ‘bigger fish to fry’ … wouldn’t you think?

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Monday, December 12, 2016

Are State and Federal Governments Starting (at last) to Recognize Abortion as Criminal?


With most of the media focused on President-elect Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, it’s quite possible that you may have missed some major developments at both the federal and state levels of government regarding the American holocaust.  

On December 1st, the House Energy & Commerce Committee’s Select Investigative Panel decided to refer the Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast (PPGC) to the Texas attorney general for criminal prosecution due to its selling of aborted baby parts.

In the summer of 2015, the Center for Medical Progress (CMP) unveiled its undercover video investigation into Planned Parenthood’s (PP) scandal in trafficking of baby organs. At PPGC in Houston, Texas, the undercover actors found that employees were hiding their sale of fetal issue by using “accounting gimmicks.”  “The evidence that Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast charged exorbitant amounts of taxpayer money in exchange for fetal specimens that it provided at nearly zero cost is overwhelming,” CMP President David  Daleiden said at the time … urging Texas leaders to send a message that Houston’s children are “not for sale.”

They got the message … and so did Congress.  After the Select Investigative Panel’s investigation, they felt compelled to refer PPGC for criminal prosecution.

Family Research Council President, Tony Perkins, believes the panel has taken the first concrete step to holding PP accountable for its grave actions.  “The panel’s recommendation that Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast be criminally prosecuted is the appropriate next step in bringing justice to bear on a group that clearly sees itself as above the law.  With criminal prosecution a growing possibility, the new Congress should once again use the reconciliation process to redirect taxpayer dollars away from Planned Parenthood,” Perkins urged.

The time to defund PP is at hand; and I urge the incoming Trump Administration to make it happen.  The 56-million unborn fellow Americans since the 1973 Roe v Wade U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) decision … that legalized abortion-on-demand … cry for justice.

It is further noteworthy, that the Ohio Senate passed a bill that will ban abortions once the baby’s heartbeat is detected.  The so-called ‘Heartbeat Bill’ passed in the Ohio House in 2015.  The measure, if signed into law, would stop the abortion of children whose heartbeat can be detected … which is at about eight weeks’ gestation.

The bill was added to House Bill 493, which addresses child abuse reporting.  It passed by a 21-10 margin during the senate’s lame-duck session.  The Ohio House must agree to amendments and specific language, and then the bill goes to Governor John Kasich’s desk.

Janet Folger Porter wrote, promoted, and campaigned relentlessly for the Ohio ‘Heartbeat Bill,’ which has inspired identical bills in Indiana, Alabama, North Dakota, and Arkansas. In 2003, Porter founded Faith2Action, an activist organization championing natural marriage, the family, and the sanctity of innocent human life.

Porter had called out numerous Ohio state senators for keeping the ‘Heartbeat Bill’ from getting to a vote.  Governor Kasich and Ohio legislators (including state Sen. Keith Faber and Majority Whip Larry Obhof) opposed the bill … despite claiming to be pro-life … because they said they feared that it would not survive a SCOTUS challenge.  Kasich’s and Faber’s opposition to the pro-life bill prompted citizens to dub the governor “a Pro-life Pretender.”  Porter, who was once a spokesperson for Gov. Kasich, split with Kasich over the ‘Heartbeat Bill.’  “You can’t block a bill like this and call yourself pro-life,” Porter told LifeSiteNews.  “These obstructionists are getting away with murder – literally – and we can’t let them go unopposed,” Porter said.

The times are changing; and in this case for the good!

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Friday, December 9, 2016

Prepare to be ‘Set Free’ from PC


One thing the recent election reinforced is that ‘tolerance’ is the last thing progressives actually want.  Though tolerance, properly understood, is a wonderful virtue, the vitriol-laden media coverage, student demonstrations and other forms of protest against the incoming Trump Administration are ample evidence of the ‘intolerance’ of those crying the loudest for tolerance.

Donald Trump’s election as president, along with the Republicans’ capture of the majority of governorships, statehouses and both branches of Congress, has left progressives seething.  They cannot fathom why many fellow Americans still resist their call for a permanent secular revolution in values, economics and everyday language.

Having taken over the mainstream media, government run universities, the entertainment industry and even corporate boardrooms, the progressives figured their revolution was inevitable.  They dismiss opponents as being on “the wrong side of history.”

Deployed whenever a speed bump slows down their agenda, that phrase betrays the progressive movement’s Marxist roots.  Since the French Revolution, the Left has seen history as an ongoing dialectic (thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis) that is steadily evolving (like humanity itself, we’re told) toward a classless, property-free society … with them in charge, of course.  To get there, they have had to persuade their fellow citizens to adopt their rosy, futuristic view, or simply use brute force.

In America, with our long tradition of individualism, capitalism, vibrant religious faith and strong families, the Left has taken a third road: political correctness.  They’ve done this by commandeering the institutions that convey cultural values – including corporations – and use them to enforce the speaking of a new language that is always one step ahead of the mindset of the “deplorables” and irredeemables … especially those who cling to their guns and Bibles.

Let’s not forget what the progressive agenda has given us: government spending became “investing”; sex became “gender”; abortion became “choice”; patriotism became “white nationalism” or “xenophobia”; “gay” became an innate characteristic equal to other civil rights. 

At the university level, which is ‘ground zero’ for progressive nonsense, the fruits of many years of labor are ripening … perhaps over-ripening.  At various universities, student radicals are demanding a “sanctuary campus,” where they would be “safe” from campus police … whose members may have supported Mr. Trump since the Fraternal Order of Police endorsed him.  The students also accused the university of “structural Islamophobia,” and demanded placing more Palestinian students “to prevent their genocide at the hands of Israel.”  Oh, and they want a “place of sanctuary” for Muslim students and financial aid for illegal immigrants.

As Angelo M. Codevilla observes in “The Rise of Political Correctness” in the Fall 2016 edition of the Claremont Review of Books, “Progressive regimes demand that persons who express themselves in public (even in private) affirm any and all things that pertain to the regime’s identity lest they lose access to jobs or privileges, and be exposed to the shunning or ire of regime supporters – if not treated as criminals.”

This brings to mind Christian business owners who have been demonized and even prosecuted for not violating their beliefs against facilitating same-sex ceremonies or providing abortifacients.  Although many people are appalled, few dare to question this cultural fascism.  “Even totalitarian regimes can reward or punish only a few people at a time,” Prof. Codevilla notes.  “Tacit collaboration by millions who bite their lip is even more essential than lip service by thousands of favor seekers.”

Listen: Soon, silence won’t be enough.  In Orwell’s 1984, it was not sufficient for Big Brother to coerce Winston into compliance.  They “finished breaking his spirt by holding up four fingers and demanding that Winston acknowledge seeing five,” Prof. Codevilla writes.

Millions of Americans are being told to accept what they know to be false – or else.  But the good news is that eventually, peddlers of lies lose respect and are no longer trusted. Americans have become leery of whatever the mainstream media tells them.

The media and their Hollywood friends fully expected us to hand over the keys to the White House to the same bunch that has been radically transforming America.  When this didn’t happen, they threw a tantrum.

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

How Trump Could Trumpet the Church’s Prophetic Voice


Though once Republican rivals, Dr. Ben Carson is serving President-elect Donald Trump as a Godly counselor in an unofficial capacity.  As Trump describes removing the Johnson Amendment, Carson recently told a select group of evangelicals exactly how the move would free pastors to help return America to Judeo-Christian values.  “If we get the Johnson Amendment rescinded, pastors can have fiery sermons and talk about what’s right and what’s wrong (again),” Carson said as part of the Salt and Light Lecture conference call.

The so-called Johnson Amendment refers to a change in the U.S. tax code made in 1954 which prohibited certain 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations (i.e., churches) from engaging in political commentary – endorsing and opposing political candidates.  It is named for [then] Senator Lyndon B. Johnson of Texas, who proposed the bill that became law.

Today, the Johnson Amendment is often cited as to why pastors refrain from discussing controversial sins, such as homosexuality, in their pulpits.  [Lord knows I’m not among those pastors.]

“Now we hear pleasant things and everybody sings ‘Kumbaya,’ and it’s not an accurate representation of the world we live in,” Carson says of today’s churches.  “If we rescind the Johnson Amendment and people are not afraid of losing their tax (status), then we will see Donald Trump be vigorous,” and Judeo-Christian values return to the American forefront. 

Trump isn’t the only advocate to rescind the Johnson Amendment.  Erik Stanley, Senior Legal Counsel and head of the Pulpit Initiative for the Alliance Defense Fund, writes for the Los Angeles Times:
The Johnson Amendment allows the government to determine when a pastor’s speech becomes too ‘political.’  That is an absurdly ridiculous standard.  A pastor’s speech from the pulpit that talks about candidates from a Scriptural point of view is religious speech.  That speech doesn’t become political any more than a pastor’s speech becomes commercial when he gives a Scripture-based assessment of the current financial debacle on Wall Street.  Allowing government agents to make that determination is as absurd as asking a first-grader to design and build NASA’s next space shuttle.”

The Johnson Amendment also allows the government to analyze the content of a pastor’s sermon to determine whether it violates the law.  That is called a content-based restriction on speech, which the (First) Amendment’s free-speech clause prohibits … unless the government has a compelling reason for censorship.

But churches are, perhaps, not in as much danger as they might expect.  “The truth is, no church has ever lost its tax-exempt status for either endorsing or opposing any political candidate or endorsing or opposing a local, state or federal law,” said Mat Staver, Founder and Chairman of Liberty Counsel.  “Voting is both a privilege and a duty.  The future of America is at stake every time we face a national election, and this past election was one of the most important elections in recent history. To not vote is to vote.  Silence is not an option.  I encourage pastors to remove the muzzle that secularists want to put on them and exchange it for a megaphone to speak Biblical truths regarding social and moral issues.”

According to a new Pew Research study, 64% of regular churchgoers said they heard sermons on religious freedom, abortion, homosexuality, immigration, environmental issues and more during the election season.

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Monday, December 5, 2016

Freedom of Conscience for All … or Is It Just for Some?


A concept that is not difficult to grasp … but seems difficult for some courts and legislators to carry out … is freedom of conscience extended to all people.  If you’re a cake artist, a floral artist, a photographic artist or another creative professional, you’ve seen the news and felt (rightfully so) that your freedom is in danger.  If, however, you are a fashion designer, you’re probably feeling pretty good right about now.

With the election of Donald Trump, one of the latest controversies comes from clothing designer Sophie Theallet, who recently wrote that she “will not participate in dressing or associating in any way with the next First Lady.”  In explaining her decision, she invoked her deeply-held belief in ‘individual freedom.’  “As a family owned company,” Theallet explains, “we value our artistic freedom and always humbly seek to contribute to a more humane, conscious and ethical way to create in this world.”  She considers her and her family’s work to be “an expression of [their] artistic and philosophical ideas,” and the leftist elite are quick to agree.  But why do they become so skeptical when the person asserting artistic freedom is a floral artist whose views they don’t like?

The mainstream media covered the decision of Ms. Theallet, with no hint of accusing her of bigotry.  This is, after all, a matter of conscience and freedom, not bigotry.

As Mary Katharine Ham writes, at The Federalist: “But these are the same arguments the left and media have dismissed from Baronelle Stutzman, a Washington florist who thinks making custom bouquets for a same-sex marriage doesn’t comport with her personal beliefs.  In appealing to the state Supreme Court after a three-year legal battle, Stutzman’s lawyer argued this week that arranging flowers is artistic expression protected under the First Amendment.  Stutzman — a Southern Baptist — would have been more than happy to sell prearranged flowers out of the cooler because that was ‘not custom expression.’ ”

In other words, the exact same logic applies to both the fashion designer and the florist (and the baker and the photographer).  Off-the-rack dresses, pre-arranged flowers, and other similar “pre-expressed” products are not a problem; nobody is going to stop the president-elect’s wife from purchasing a dress from any given fashion designer.

If, however, you believe that Ms. Theallet has the freedom to opt out of providing creative expressions for the president-elect’s wife, then it strains the imagination to find a reason to force Mrs. Stutzman to provide custom, creative expressions for an event to which she has an objection.

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

Friday, December 2, 2016

HGTV Stars Under Fire for Their Faith


One of my wife’s favorite TV channels is HGTV.  And one of the many shows featured on this network is ‘Fixer Upper’ … with hosts Chip and Joanna Gaines of Waco, Texas.  The Gaines are devout Christians.  Viewers can see how their faith flavors not only their television program – but also their family life.  But not everyone appreciates those Christian beliefs – especially the militant LGBT crowd.

The Mainstream Media and militant LGBT activists are unleashing their wrath over reports that the Gaines family attends Antioch Community Church – a non-denominational mega-church.  Cosmopolitan recently had this shrieking headline – “Chip and Joanna Gaines’s Pastor Preaches ‘Homosexuality is a Sin.’ ”  A Buzzfeed headline stated – “Chip and Joanna Gaines’ Church is Firmly Against Same-Sex Marriage” … and added “Their pastor considers homosexuality to be a ‘sin’ caused by abuse – whether the Fixer Upper couple agrees is unclear.”  Cosmo reported – “Their pastor, Jimmy Seibert, is both staunchly against same-sex marriage and a strong believer that homosexuality is a ‘lifestyle’ choice and a ‘sin.’ ” … going on to say – “Given the diversity of Fixer Upper’s audience, this is a startling revelation that has left many wondering where Chip and Jo stand.”  Buzzfeed went so far as to investigate Pastor Seibert’s sermons – demonstrating that what is preached from the pulpit at Antioch Community Church is the same kind of message being preached in nearly every evangelical church in America … certainly from the pulpit in which I preach.

US Weekly quoted one viewer declaring – “As a Fixer Upper fan, I would love to know @joannagaines and @chippergaines’s thoughts on their pastor’s hateful, anti-LGBT beliefs.”  Another went further, writing – “If Chip and Joanna Gaines end up being anti-LGBT, I am cancelling my mag subscription and ignoring their show.”

An HGTV spokesperson told Todd Starnes of FoxNews in a statement, they “respect the privacy of our show hosts and will not comment on matters related to their personal lives.”

Starnes says this: “Here’s a truth bomb for Cosmo and Buzzfeed – It’s really none of your business where Chip and Joanna Gaines worship.  And for the record, where were their hysterical screeds when President Obama’s pastor was asking God to damn America? Anybody want to talk about those roosting chickens?”

If anybody is most likely to know what Chip and Joanna are going through it is David and Jason Benham.  The Benham Brothers, who run a very successful North Carolina real estate company, were fired from HGTV back in 2014 after a militant LGBT mob bullied the network into submission.  The brothers are well-known evangelical Christians – and are outspoken proponents of traditional marriage.  “We were actually filming our show the exact same time the Gaines were filming their first episode,” said David.  “We developed a great relationship.”  And the first telephone call the brothers received when they were given the heave-ho was from Chip.  “He called to support us – to say, ‘Guys, I’m in this with you, brother,” Jason said.  “The Gaines’ believe as we do – as millions as other Christians do – that marriage is between a man and a woman.”  “That’s not anti-anything,” Jason continued.  “That’s not hateful.  Chip and Joanna don’t hate anybody.  It’s ridiculous.”

The Benham Brothers said they especially feel bad for HGTV being pushed into another faux controversy.  “It’s a mafia,” David said referring to the militant activists.  “They are going to go after the Gaines family.  They are going to try and vilify them.  They are going to try and vilify their church and their pastor.  And if they can’t get anyone to bend or concede, they are going to start vilifying HGTV and going after their advertisers.”

It’s absolutely true that the Gaines family attends a church that believes marriage is between one man and one woman.  Should that disqualify them from having a television program on HGTV?  Do the militant LGBT activists want to create a ‘Black List’ – banning individuals who attend evangelical Christian churches from working in the industry?  Is that what they want?

It’s time for all freedom-loving Americans to rise up and stand with HGTV and the Gaines family.  To the militant LGBT mob, we must say — “Stand down!  Enough is enough!”

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel