Four pastors in
Massachusetts (MA) are dropping their lawsuit against the state after the
attorney general’s office revised the interpretation of a new gender identity anti-discrimination
law which categorized churches as places of public accommodation.
The state’s move
protects the 1st Amendment rights of MA churches to express their beliefs about
gender and sexuality and operate their bathrooms in a manner consistent with
their theology.
Classifying churches as places of
public accommodation is virtually unprecedented and potentially opens them up
to a variety of anti-discrimination laws that could clash with their beliefs.
Just last month, a federal judge
struck down such a categorization in Iowa noting that “state and federal courts
have held that churches and programs they host are not places of public
accommodation.”
In July, MA lawmakers amended the
state’s anti-discrimination law to prohibit discrimination in places of public
accommodation based on a person’s stated gender identity. The trouble for churches came Sept. 1st, when
the MA Commission Against Discrimination issued a “Gender Identity Guidance”
that said churches could be considered as places of public accommodation under
certain conditions. “A church could be seen
as place of public accommodation if it holds a secular event, such as a
spaghetti supper, that is open to the general public,” said the commission. The guidance says that an individual’s gender
identity can be identified “by an evidence that the gender identity is
sincerely held as a part of the person’s core identity.” The guidance goes on to explain that
preventing a person from using a bathroom or other sex-segregated facility that’s
consistent with their gender identity violates the law. It also says that places of public accommodation
should follow best practices, such as using pronouns that transgender people
prefer, refraining from derogatory comments and avoiding gender-specific dress
codes.
The attorney general’s office also
issued a “Gender Identity Guidance for Public Accommodations” and said that “houses
of worship” are places of public accommodation.
Now, the attorney general’s office
says that its revision to the guidance removes the “categorical reference to ‘houses
of worship’ as an example of a ‘place of public accommodation.’ ”
Genevieve Nadeau, Chief of the Civil
Rights Division in the attorney general’s office noted that the pastors’
lawsuit “caused us to focus on these issues and to make this revision.”
Thank God for the boldness of these
four pastors to stand-up against this anti-discrimination law. Reminds me of four children of Israel in Babylon
who refused to bow-down to an idol. [read Daniel 3]
Rev.
Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain
(Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor,
Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel
Now let the Supreme Court rule this way and end the discrimination against Christians. I now encourage our Atheists to go after the Islamic faith.
ReplyDelete