A hospital in Texas decided not to
fight a judge’s orders to remove a pregnant brain dead woman from life support,
removing the woman from the ventilator … and thus ending her nearly 23-week-old
baby’s life.
“From the onset, JPS has said its role was not to make
nor contest law but to follow it,” John
Peter Smith Hospital representative J.R. Labbe wrote in a statement. “ … a state district judge ordered the removal
of life-sustaining treatment from Marlise Munoz. The hospital will follow the court order.”
Munoz, 33, has been on a ventilator
since late November when her husband Erick, 26, found her unconscious in the
middle of the night. According to Mr.
Munoz, the woman got up after 2 a.m. to check on their infant son, and when she
did not return, he got up to check on both of them, finding his wife collapsed
on the floor. Doctors believe that Munoz
suffered a blood clot in her lung, which caused her to collapse. She has had no brain activity since being
admitted to JPS Hospital in Fort
Worth two months ago. Her baby, who was
fourteen weeks in gestation at the time of the incident, reportedly had a
measurable heartbeat, which resulted in a disagreement between the hospital and
Munoz’ family.
Munoz’ husband and her parents both
wanted the mother removed from life support, asserting that she would not wish
to be kept alive by machines. Munoz
worked as a paramedic, as does her husband. “Marlise firmly requested not to be put on
life support,” her mother Lynne wrote on a local news outlet’s Facebook page. “Her wishes are not being honored.”
The family filed a lawsuit against JPS Hospital after officials contended
that they could not legally remove Munoz from the ventilator due to the Texas Advance Directive Act – which
states that “a person may not withdraw or withhold life-sustaining treatment”
from a pregnant woman. Thus, Munoz must
be kept on life support until the baby can be delivered at a viable stage,
usually 24 to 26 weeks gestation.
Following a hearing, Judge R.H.
Wallace sided with Munoz’s family, stating that she is deceased and that the
law being cited by the hospital does not apply to the dead. “The provisions of … the Texas Health and Safety Code do not apply to Marlise Munoz because
applying the standard used in determining death … Mrs. Munoz is dead,” he
wrote.
As the hospital had argued at trial
that it had never pronounced Munoz dead, Wallace ordered that it now do so and
remove her from life support. The
hospital decided to comply with the order and removed Munoz from the ventilator
… and released Munoz’ body to her husband.
“The Munoz and Machado families will
now proceed with the somber task of laying Marlise Munoz’s body to rest, and
grieving over the great loss that has been suffered,” attorneys Heather L. King
and Jessica H. Janicek wrote in a statement. “May Marlise Munoz finally rest in peace, and
her family find the strength to complete what has been an unbearably long and
arduous journey.”
However, some are expressing great
disapproval over the outcome of the situation, explaining that it has now
resulted in two tragedies–the death of both the mother and child. Based on the information made public, Mrs.
Munoz was not experiencing multi-system organ failure or cell disintegration,
and her body was supporting the growth of the child within her—all signs
indicated that her brain, though impaired or quiescent, was still ordering her
physiological functions at some level.
“The death of baby Munoz represents
a colossal failure on so many levels. Her
father failed her. The Attorney General
of Texas Greg Abbot failed her. The
hospital failed her. Finally, by
usurping the will of the people of Texas, the courts failed her,” said Mark
Harrington, Executive Director of the pro-life group Created Equal.” If only one
of those in position to stop this execution of baby Munoz would have stepped up
to the plate and done the right thing, she would have been born alive in the
next few weeks. Baby Munoz was a human
being who deserved the same legal protections of born people. The truth is baby Munoz was executed by
judicial tyranny.”
I appeal to my fellow followers of
Jesus; it’s time for us to speak up for those who cannot speak for
themselves. Proverbs 31:8-9 compels us
to do so: “Speak up for those who cannot
speak for themselves, for the rights of all who are destitute. Speak up and judge fairly; defend the rights
of the poor and needy.” We can’t
just sit back and do nothing, my friends.
The Bible is very clear. Proverbs
24:11 lays it out in pretty strong words: “Rescue
those being led away to death; hold back those staggering toward slaughter.” In some of Moses’ last words, he urges us to
choose life in Deuteronomy 30:19: “…I
have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your
children may live.” Can Christ count
on you … who were granted life … to step up, speak out and reach out to pregnant
women and unborn children? May God grant
that this evil will pass from our land.
Rev.
Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain
(Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel
A well written article. The Texas law was enacted to prevent this very thing from happening. I'm sure the medical technology is available to determine more than just a heartbeat. I believe that at the very least a much better assessment of the child's viability could have been accomplished. It's regrettable that a father, especially one who saves lives everyday, would so willing give up his own child's life.
ReplyDelete