President Obama’s nominee to serve as the top
U.S. tax prosecutor has stalled over an obscure letter he wrote 7-years ago
questioning the legal tactics of a group that wants pastors to speak out on
politics.
The standoff involves Cono Namorato, a
Washington defense attorney and former government lawyer, who was nominated February
24, 2015 to serve as the assistant attorney general over the Justice
Department’s (DoJ) tax division. The
outcome will determine the leadership of the division’s 370-criminal/civil
lawyers, who pursue offshore tax evasion and other investigations.
73-year old Namorato, won bipartisan praise at
his July 22 hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee; but never got a
confirmation vote from that panel. Some
members of the judiciary panel have expressed concerns. After Namorato’s hearing Republican Senator
Charles Grassley, the panel’s chairman, asked him about a 2008 letter he
co-signed that urged the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to investigate the
actions of lawyers at the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF). ADF seeks to use the legal system to promote
Christian values like religious freedom, the sanctity of life and marriage and
family. It opposes a 1954 change to the
tax code that bars tax-exempt organizations from taking a stand on political
candidates. ADF has challenged IRS to
enforce the law, which would lay the groundwork for a legal challenge on 1st
Amendment grounds.
According to its website, ADF encourages pastors
to speak “freely and boldly from their pulpit about the issues of the day.” It says the “IRS controls pulpits” because it
can “tell pastors what they can and cannot preach.” The ADF claims that 4,100 pastors agree the
1954 law must be changed, that 2,032 have violated it since 2008; and that
1,600 preached an election sermon in October 2014.
In September 2008, when the group was starting
its “Pulpit Freedom Initiative,” Namorato and two other lawyers at his
Washington firm, Caplin & Drysdale, wrote to the IRS Office of Professional
Responsibility. They said the ADF was
“explicitly soliciting churches across America to violate Federal law” for
tax-exempt organizations in section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. By encouraging “mass violation of Federal tax
law,” the ADF engaged in “incompetent and disreputable conduct” under
regulations governing behavior for lawyers who practice before the IRS, they
wrote. The letter urged an investigation
into whether the lawyers violated the conduct rules, and advocated “immediate
and appropriate action to address this flagrant disregard of the ethical rules
for practice before the IRS.” The IRS
took no action against the ADF.
“Mr. Namorato’s documented involvement in
encouraging the IRS to investigate lawyers working with the Pulpit Freedom
Initiative is quite concerning to a number of members, including the chairman,”
said committee spokesman Taylor Foy. “The
committee thoroughly vets all nominees,” Foy said. “When questions arise during that deliberative
process, those concerns are dealt with before proceeding. At this point, those concerns have not been
addressed for this nominee.”
In 19-written questions and responses dated July
31 and August 14, Grassley pressed Namorato on the 2008 letter. The senator asked what guidance Namorato, if
confirmed, would give the IRS about whether it should monitor the content of
sermons. Namorato said the Tax
Division’s role on that question is limited.
Grassley asked Namorato how he would view the Pulpit Freedom Initiative. “If I am confirmed and the IRS were to
determine that a church or pastor violated the restrictions on political
activity and referred the matter to the Tax Division, I would ensure that the
merits of the litigation were evaluated in the same manner as any other
referral,” Namorato responded. In
response to Grassley, Namorato also said he didn’t believe the lawyers acted
criminally. Yet, he said, his concern
was with the ADF’s “active solicitation of clients for the purpose of assisting
them in committing a violation of law.”
If Namorato is confirmed, his work in a DoJ tax
division is a valid concern for America’s pastors and churches, who could be in
jeopardy of losing their tax-exempt status for exercising their 1st Amendment
rights.
ADF has written a letter to the Judiciary
Committee chair, Senator Chuck Grassley, urging the nomination be rejected. If you believe in religious liberty as
clearly defined in the U.S. Constitution, then add your voice to the rejection
of Obama’s nomination … while there is yet time.
Rev. Dr.
Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain
(Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor,
Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel
In the past the IRS has not enforced these laws because they know they would lose on first amendment grounds and then pastors would know that they are safe. That may no longer be the case since the SCOTUS is so left leaning now. Still, the IRS enjoys having pastors fearful of their tax free status and doesn't want to let the cat out of the bag just yet. Soon though, the government will be so tyrannical that first amendment protections will be a thing of the past.
ReplyDelete