Friday, March 24, 2017

Proactive State Laws Protect Religious Liberty


Two states take specific action to protect religious liberty – Kentucky and South Dakota. 

Kentucky
The legislature of the State of Kentucky has passed a bill to protect the right to religious expression in public schools.  The impetus for the bill was due to a censorship issue that occurred around Christmastime.  School officials reportedly censored the scene from the beloved “A Charlie Brown Christmas” in which the character Linus talks about the true meaning of Christmas.  

The school in Johnson County censored the scene from the school’s Christmas production, according to OneNewsNow.com.  “A Charlie Brown Christmas” was created by the late Charles Schultz who reportedly insisted on including the scene in which Linus reads the Christmas story from the Gospel According to St. Luke in the original airing of the film in 1965.

The KY Senate easily passed the religious freedom bill in a 31-3 vote.  The bill also passed the House easily in a 81-8 vote.  It now goes to the desk of Republican Governor Matt Bevin … who is known for his Christian faith.

Some legislators claimed that the religious freedom bill was not necessary since such rights are already protected in the 1st Amendment; but Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) attorney Matt Sharp noted that the recent censorship issue proves that the bill is needed.  “Even though the Supreme Court has repeatedly held that schools can include the Bible and other religious stories and elements as part of the educational process, there was confusion in Kentucky over this play,” Sharp said.  “And so what this law does is reaffirm what the Constitution says.”

South Dakota
South Dakota (SD) Republican Governor Dennis Daugaard recently signed a law preventing faith-based adoption agencies from facing government discrimination for not placing children with same-sex couples. 

The law is Senate Bill 149, sponsored by Senator Alan Solano (District 32 – R), and Representative Steven Haugaard (District 10 – R).  “No child-placement agency may be required to provide any service that conflicts with, or provide any service under circumstances that conflict with any sincerely-held religious belief or moral conviction of the child-placement agency,” says the bill.  These beliefs “shall be contained in a written policy, statement of faith, or other document adhered to by a child-placement agency.”  The law continues, “The state may not discriminate or take any adverse action against a child-placement agency or an organization seeking to become a child-placement agency” … because of its sincerely-held religious or moral beliefs.

In Massachusetts, Illinois, and Washington, D.C., Catholic Charities has been forced to shut down for refusing to place children with same-sex couples.  “I’m worried that a child placement agency may make what is in the best interest of the child a correct decision but be subject to a lawsuit by someone who has a little bit of a leg up by virtue of being in a protective class,” said Daugaard.  “And if we can forestall that with this legislation then I’m willing to do that.”

“At least in South Dakota, children won’t be pawns in the Left’s push to legitimize same-sex parents,” the Family Research Council (FRC) wrote of SD’s new law.

“The law would ensure that the State of South Dakota may not coerce them to abandon their sincerely-held religious beliefs or moral convictions in their placement decisions and the ongoing need for placement of children in safe nurturing homes will be served,” according to the South Dakota Family Policy Council (SDFPC).

FRC and the SDFPC pointed out that currently SD faith-based adoption agencies don’t receive state funds for child placement services.  This law simply means that in the future they won’t be forced to choose between closing or abandoning their religious beliefs.

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a homosexual lobby group, suggested this bill will be used to discriminate against interracial couples.  It will also allow “state-funded adoption and foster care agencies to discriminate against LGBTQ youth in their care,” the HRC said in a press release.  “Some adoption agencies may have a vendetta against LGBTQ couples, mixed-faith couples or interracial couples,” said HRC legal director Sarah Warbelow.

James Kinyon, Executive Director of Catholic Social Services in Rapid City, told local media the law “allows us to do what we can for the common good” without threat of retribution from the government.

Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

No comments:

Post a Comment