The
American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) recently
secured an important victory on behalf of a student attending a community
college in Oregon when the school rightly recognized his 1st Amendment right to
address curricular assignments from a religious viewpoint.
The situation arose when, after
multiple back-and-forth communications involving faith, the professor read the student’s
latest assignment, an essay on friendship, in which the student alluded to the
intimately close friendship one might have as a Christian with Jesus. The professor voluntarily injected her own
personal beliefs into the conversation by noting on the assignment paper that
not everyone believed in God. When the
student responded by expressing his concerns for the professor, based on his
faith, the professor asked the student to refrain from further discussing
religion with her. The student
respectfully explained that the reason he discusses religion with others,
including her, is because he believes, based on his reading of the Bible, Christians
have a responsibility to share their faith. In the same response, however, the student
expressly wrote that he would honor the professor’s request and cease personal
religious discussions.
Despite this acknowledgment and
agreement to her request, the professor complained to the college that the
student was harassing her, prompting a meeting with a college official
responsible for addressing student conduct issues. While the student maintained his agreement not
to address matters of religion with the professor on a personal level, the
conduct officer’s instructions went further, restricting the student from addressing
matters of religion in any way in this professor’s class, including when
appropriately responding to curricular assignments.
With the assistance of ACLJ, the
student notified the conduct officer that he could not agree to such terms, as
they would operate in direct violation of his right to the freedom of speech. The conduct officer, however, was undeterred
and maintained the position that the student must treat this particular
professor’s class as effectively a religion-free zone. ACLJ immediately issued a letter to the
college’s administration explaining that students have a constitutional right
to speak from a religious viewpoint, and, as courts have repeatedly recognized,
such speech, when germane to the subject matter of an assignment, rather than
constituting harassment, is in fact fully protected. ACLJ’s letter demanded that the college
retract the instructions given by the conduct officer and formally acknowledge
the student’s right to respond to curricular assignments from a religious perspective. The college was quick to respond and rightly
agreed that the student would be permitted, without further negative
consequences, to respond to curricular assignments from a religious point of
view.
Thus, when the student was recently
assigned an essay discussing holidays that are important to him, and the reasons
therefor, he was able to write about Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Easter,
including the explanation that for him, as a Christian, Easter is important
because Jesus’ resurrection provided the opportunity for eternal life.
Thank God for such legal organizations
as ACLJ who defend the right of students to engage in religious expression free
from the result of government-imposed penalties … even when it may be deemed
offensive to some. ACLJ will continue to
remind government entities that religious speech is constitutionally protected
and, despite the objections of those who find such speech controversial, it may
not, for that reason, be silenced.
Rev.
Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain
(Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel
No comments:
Post a Comment