Friday, September 27, 2013

A Shariah Court Sentences a Rape Victim to 90-lashes, Plus 110 More and 6-months in Prison

I’ve written several blogs (August 26, July 22) on the dangers of Shariah Law coming to America.  Perhaps this blog posting reported by examiner.com will convince some more of you as to the very real threat this Islamic law governing all of life is to America’s rule of law.
 
Imagine a rape victim’s sentence being increased because her lawyer had spoken out.  That is precisely what happened in a Saudi Court. When the defense attorney for a raped Saudi Arabian woman appealed a Shariah Court decision that the 90-lash sentence against his client was unjust, all that was succeeded was the more than doubling of the punishment meted out to the woman who was raped and beaten by seven men … as reported September 22, 2013 by the women’s rights-centered news portal The Clarion Project.
 
A yet to be publicly identified female gang rape victim was initially found guilty and sentenced to 90-lashes for violating the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's (KSA) rigid Islamic law on segregation of the sexes.  The Kingdom’s General Court determined the woman sat in an automobile with an old school chum to whom she was no blood relation; hence, she violated Islamic Shariah Law of gender segregation.  The victim’s lawyer Abdul Rahman al-Lahem had plead to the international community for help in freeing his client or at least pressuring the Saudi government to grant an appeal.  And an appeal he got … along with an increase in sentence from 90-lashes to 200 along with a six month prison sentence tacked on for good measure.
 
The KSA Ministry of Justice implied the victim's sentence was increased because her lawyer had spoken out to the world’s news outlets.  As carried by the government’s official Saudi Press Agency: “For whoever has an objection on verdicts issued, the system allows to appeal without resorting to the media.”  The statement also said that the “charges were proven” against the woman for having been in a car with a strange male, and repeated criticism of her lawyer for talking “defiantly” about the judicial system, saying “it has shown ignorance.”
 
The victim was attacked in 2006 while she was attempting to retrieve a photograph from a male high school student she knew.  While in her acquaintance’s vehicle, two other men got in the car and drove the woman and her friend to a secluded area where five other men met them.  It was in this remote area where all seven men raped the woman.  The Clarion Project also cited that the woman’s friend was in turn “attacked” by the assailants, but it is unclear if he was beaten, raped or both.
 
Attorney Abdul Rahman al-Lahem has since been banned from further defending the woman.  The KSA has confiscated his law license and summoning him to a disciplinary hearing later this month.
 
Shariah law is completely antithetical to the U.S. Constitution.  Remember that Islam is an ideology, but under shariah, it is law.  People who don’t understand this have no idea of the ramifications of America falling to Shariah law.  They may have a hard time with Christians wanting to say the Pledge of Allegiance with the words, “One nation under God” or to have public displays of the Ten Commandments or nativities etc.  But these same people have no idea of what life would be like under Islamic rule and Shariah law.  One only has to look at countries such as Saudi Arabia, or see groups such as the Afghani Taliban to know that shariah is discriminatory, and degrading toward, in the Islamic term, infidels.
 
Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

No comments:

Post a Comment