Monday, September 30, 2013

Two States/One Nation – Polar Opposite on Abortion

In California, if you want an abortion you may not even need a physician.  If Bill AB 154 passes both houses of the state legislature, Democrat Gov. Jerry Brown is expected to sign it into law.  The bill strips the requirement that an abortion be performed by a licensed physician or surgeon.  Instead, a nurse practitioner, certified nurse midwife, or physician assistant would be allowed to do a suction aspiration or medical abortion on a woman.  A suction aspiration abortion is when a vacuum is inserted into a woman's cervix and removes the contents of the uterus.  Suction aspiration abortions are not without controversy. Brian Johnston, president of California Pro-Life Council, said that even former abortionists have spoken out against the technique.  “The founder of National Abortion Rights Action League, Dr. Bernard Nathanson, who subsequently became pro-life, says that vacuum aspiration abortion is inherently dangerous to the mother, as the physician must blindly probe for the baby.”  The bill has been endorsed by the California Medical Association, and has been strongly supported by abortion advocates.  Interestingly, in California, if an animal needs an abortion, the procedure must be carried out by a licensed veterinary surgeon.  It appears, therefore, that the State of California views humans as deserving a lower standard of care than a housecat.
 
Then there’s North Dakota, where a judge’s ruling dismisses part of an abortion center’s lawsuit against a North Dakota law that bans abortions on disabled unborn children.  With the governor’s signature on the ban, North Dakota became the first state to ban abortions based on genetic “defects” like Down Syndrome.  When diagnosed before birth, such genetic abnormalities prompt couples to have abortions 90% of the time. The state legislature approved the measure and Republican Gov. Jack Dalrymple signed it in March 2013.  The measure also bans abortion based on gender selection … an issue of increasing concern in the United States as people from nations like China and India migrate to the U.S. and bring their cultural preference for boys with them.  District Judge Daniel Hovland dismissed the legal challenge by the state’s lone abortion business – Red River Women’s Clinic in Fargo (backed by the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights) – in its lawsuit filed in June.  In an AP report, the abortion center claims the ruling is okay … since it reportedly doesn’t do abortions for those reasons anyway.  However, they provided no proof that it asks abortion clients if they are having an abortion because of a prenatal diagnosis of Down Syndrome or another condition.  Janet Crepps, an attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights, said in a statement that “it is not clear that the measure will have a direct impact on any women seeking abortion services at the Red River Women’s Clinic at this time.”  At the time the law was signed this year, Americans United for Life President Charmaine Yoest told LifeNews she was delighted Rep. Bette Grande championed the bill.  The law is based on AUL-model legislation and also makes North Dakota the fifth state to ban the sexist practice of ending a child’s life based on its sex.  The other states that ban sex-selective abortions are Arizona, Illinois, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania.
 
King David, thinking of himself as a person while he was growing in his mother’s womb, says of God, “You [God] formed my inward parts; You knitted me together in my mother’s womb.  I praise You because I am fearfully and wonderfully made … My frame was not hidden from You when I was made in the secret place, when I was woven together … Your eyes saw my unformed body.” (Psalm 139:13-16)
 
Rev. Dr. Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain (Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor, Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel

No comments:

Post a Comment