The most outrageous provision of President
Obama’s transgender bathroom order does not even involve locker rooms where
teenagers of the opposite sex will change and shower next to one another;
rather, the most offensive part of the new policy is that, under the Obama Administration’s
federal guidance:
School districts must allow biological males and females to spend
the night together in the same hotel room on field trips;
Colleges must let men who say they are transgender be roommates
with one or more women; and
School officials cannot even tell those young women or their
parents in advance that their new roommate is a man, without risking a federal
lawsuit.
This plain wording of the Obama Administration’s
order is clear enough; and doesn’t just apply to high schools, but to colleges
as well. The Administration makes clear:
“In this letter, the term schools refers to recipients of
[f]ederal financial assistance at all educational levels, including school
districts, colleges, and universities.”
To drive the point home, Secretary of Education
John B. King Jr. said in a press release accompanying the letter, “No student
should ever have to go through the experience of feeling unwelcome at school or
on a college campus.”
So how would a college apply the Obama Administration’s
demand to furnish a transgender student “housing” that conforms to his “gender
identity” so that he does not feel “unwelcome” in its dorm rooms?
As demonstrated, the Administration’s guidance
makes gender dependent on the student’s assertion and nothing else; it requires
students to be housed with members of the sex with which they identify. The letter states that the college cannot tell
other students about a transgender student’s biology. “Nonconsensual disclosure of ... a student’s
birth name or sex assigned at birth, could be harmful to or invade the privacy
of transgender students,” and Obama warns it could be against the law in the
letter.
Some people would argue that not telling a
gifted 17-year-old college freshman that her new roommate is a bearded
51-year-old with male pattern baldness and a taste for young ladies violates
her privacy. But according to the
booklet, even the potential roommate cannot ask about a transgender person’s
biology, because “asking personal questions about a person’s body” is a form of
harassment. Thus, under the Administration’s
policies, a man can declare himself a female and be assigned as the year-long
roommate of a possibly under-age, co-ed. If the college tells the young lady her
roommate is a biological male without his express consent, it could be sued. And if the young lady objects, she is guilty
of stigmatizing and possibly “harassing” the poor man and should probably be
sent to sensitivity training – which she can schedule between her therapy
sessions to deal with her sexual assault.
All of this is being forced on the nation
without one legislator voting to authorize it, or even a public debate to
consult the views of the American people. Obama’s spokesman, Josh Earnest, insists these
policies are being implemented to assure that schools and universities are as
“respectful and safe as they can possibly be.” Your choice is to get on board or get sued.
The fact that nothing in Obama’s federal
guidance forecloses the possibility that a biological woman will become the
unwitting, unwilling roommate of a heterosexual biological male - overnight or
possibly much longer - tells us how far the president is willing to go to
enforce his radical ideology, and how little concern Obama has for anyone who
does not share it.
Rev. Dr.
Kenneth L. Beale, Jr.
Chaplain
(Colonel-Ret), U.S. Army
Pastor,
Ft. Snelling Memorial Chapel
Since my comments from Monday didn't get posted I will try to remember what I said and hope that this post works. Title IX was never meant to force boys and girls into the same locker rooms and showers. It was a bad attempt to try to bring equality to women's programs, mainly sports programs. The liberals and the government are unable to tell the difference between equality and sameness. How is it that all of a sudden schools are in violation of Title IX if they don't force men and women into the same locker rooms, showers, hotel rooms, etc. Has Title IX been changed recently? No, only some kind of new weird interpretation. So all these years, all these schools have been in violation apparently and none of them have been held accountable? Congress hasn't changed the law that I've heard of, just some new edict trying to make law again. This is of course unconstitutional and therefore null. States, colleges and school boards across the nation should nullify Obama's edict which is the constitutional remedy. Can he withhold federal money? Not legally but that hasn't ever stopped him before. Of course Congress could put a stop to all this with impeachment hearings but they don't have the spine to properly represent the people.
ReplyDelete